Volume 34 Issue 1
May  2021
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
FENG Hua-chao. Farmland Rights Confirmation and Farmer's Preference of Farmland Transfer Contract: An Empirical Analysis of the Survey Data of Five Counties in Three Provinces[J]. Journal of Guangdong University of Finance & Economics, 2019, 34(1): 69-79.
Citation: FENG Hua-chao. Farmland Rights Confirmation and Farmer's Preference of Farmland Transfer Contract: An Empirical Analysis of the Survey Data of Five Counties in Three Provinces[J]. Journal of Guangdong University of Finance & Economics, 2019, 34(1): 69-79.

Farmland Rights Confirmation and Farmer's Preference of Farmland Transfer Contract: An Empirical Analysis of the Survey Data of Five Counties in Three Provinces

  • Received Date: 2018-08-27
    Available Online: 2021-05-31
  • Publish Date: 2019-01-28
  • Based on the survey data from five counties of three provinces in China, through the theoretical framework of "Farmland rights confirmation-Transaction price-Contract preference of Farmland transfer", this paper empirically analyzes the influence of the Farmland rights confirmation on the contract preference and its mechanism. It is found that: The Farmland rights confirmation increased the probability of farmers selecting written contracts when they transferred to farmland, which can be achieved through the transaction price mechanism and change in the transaction price; the more agricultural inputs into the village, the higher the frequency of trading, and households would prefer the oral contract; upon the willingness to transfer from relatives and farmers with shorter transition period, farmers are more likely to choose oral contracts; the average family level of education, the area of land contract and the proportion of agricultural income also have a significant impact on the contract preferences. Therefore, farmers' preferences for transfer contract are characterized with dual nature of differential pattern and interest orientation. In the future, it is imperative to firmly promote the farmland rights confirmation, establish and improve the system of farmland property protection so as to ensure the rights and interests of peasant households.
  • loading
  • [1]
    钱龙, 洪名勇, 龚丽娟, 等. 差序格局、利益取向与农户土地流转契约选择[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2015(12): 95-104. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2104.2015.12.012
    [2]
    罗必良, 刘茜. 农地流转纠纷: 基于合约视角的分析——来自广东省的农户问卷[J]. 广东社会科学, 2013(1): 35-44. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-114X.2013.01.005
    [3]
    张乐天, 陆洋. 乡土秩序与土地流转的非均衡实践——浙江省Z村一带土地流转研究[J]. 南京社会科学, 2011(7): 55-64. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8263.2011.07.009
    [4]
    叶剑平, 田晨光. 中国农村土地权利状况: 合约结构、制度变迁与政策优化——基于中国17省1956位农民的调查数据分析[J]. 华中师范大学学报: 人文社会科学版, 2013(1): 38-46. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HZSD201301008.htm
    [5]
    洪名勇. 信任、空间距离与农地流转契约选择研究[J]. 江西财经大学学报, 2017(1): 81-90. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JXCZ201701008.htm
    [6]
    LOREN BRANDT, 李果, 黄季焜, 等. 中国的土地使用权和转移权: 现状评价[J]. 经济学(季刊), 2004(3): 951-982. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JJXU200403009.htm
    [7]
    LI D D. A theory of ambiguous property rights in transition economies: the case of the Chinese non-state sector[J]. Journal of Comparative Economics, 1996, 23(1): 1-19. doi: 10.1006/jcec.1996.0040
    [8]
    王赛德. "龙头"企业与农户的合约选择——基于风险和风险态度的解释[J]. 当代经济科学, 2006(3): 20-23, 124-125. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2848.2006.03.004
    [9]
    管珊, 万江红. 交易成本与家庭农场合约稳定性——基于对111个家庭农场的调查[J]. 农业现代化研究, 2017(2): 234-240. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NXDH201702009.htm
    [10]
    郭亮. 不完全市场化: 理解当前土地流转的一个视角——基于河南Y镇的实证调查[J]. 南京农业大学学报: 社会科学版, 2010(4): 21-27, 42. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-7465.2010.04.004
    [11]
    郭继. 农地流转合同形式制度的运行与构建——以法律社会学为视角[J]. 中国农业大学学报: 社会科学版, 2009(4): 37-44. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-508X.2009.04.004
    [12]
    罗必良. 农地流转的市场逻辑——"产权强度—禀赋效应—交易装置"的分析线索及案例研究[J]. 南方经济, 2014(5): 1-24. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6249.2014.05.001
    [13]
    洪名勇, 钱龙. 农地流转口头契约自我履约对农户未来合作意愿的影响研究[J]. 贵州社会科学, 2016(4): 145-150. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GZSK201604023.htm
    [14]
    邓宏图, 李德良. 农地产权、合约选择与制度变迁: 一个有关农地租约的历史逻辑分析[J]. 江苏社会科学, 2008(5): 39-47. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-8671.2008.05.008
    [15]
    付江涛, 纪月清, 胡浩. 产权保护与农户土地流转合约选择——兼评新一轮承包地确权颁证对农地流转的影响[J]. 江海学刊, 2016(3): 74-80, 238. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-856X.2016.03.011
    [16]
    林文声, 秦明, 苏毅清, 等. 新一轮农地确权何以影响农地流转?——来自中国健康与养老追踪调查的证据[J]. 中国农村经济, 2017(7): 29-43. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZNJJ201707003.htm
    [17]
    黄季焜, 冀县卿. 农地使用权确权与农户对农地的长期投资[J]. 管理世界, 2012(9): 76-81, 99, 187-188.
    [18]
    陈江华, 罗明忠. 农地确权对水稻劳动密集型生产环节外包的影响——基于农机投资的中介效应[J]. 广东财经大学学报, 2018(4): 98-111. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SONG201804013.htm
    [19]
    许庆, 刘进, 钱有飞. 劳动力流动、农地确权与农地流转[J]. 农业技术经济, 2017(5): 4-16. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NYJS201705001.htm
    [20]
    罗明忠, 万盼盼, 陈江华. 农地确权对农户参与土地合作的影响——基于广东农户抽样问卷调查的实证分析[J]. 农村经济, 2018(3): 31-36. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NCJJ201803007.htm
    [21]
    罗明忠, 黄晓彤. 农地确权会提高农地流转契约的稳定性吗?[J]. 农业现代化研究, 2018(4): 617-625. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NXDH201804011.htm
    [22]
    朱文钰, 罗必良. 规模经营主体的农地流转困境: 租金要挟与合约不稳定[C]//2017年首届农业经济理论前沿论坛论文集(上). 广州: 华南农业大学, 2017: 116-129.
    [23]
    刘文勇, 孟庆国, 张悦. 农地流转租约形式影响因素的实证研究[J]. 农业经济问题, 2013(8): 43-48. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NJWT201308007.htm
    [24]
    王倩, 任倩, 余劲. 粮食主产区农地流转农户议价能力实证分析[J]. 中国农村观察, 2018(2): 47-59. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZNCG201802004.htm
    [25]
    胡新艳, 罗必良. 新一轮农地确权与促进流转: 粤赣证据[J]. 改革, 2016(4): 85-94. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-REFO201604009.htm
    [26]
    罗必良, 汪沙, 李尚蒲. 交易费用、农户认知与农地流转——来自广东省的农户问卷调查[J]. 农业技术经济, 2012(1): 11-21. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NYJS201201002.htm
    [27]
    陈前恒, 池桂娟. 比较、包容与幸福——基于中国农村居民调查数据的实证分析[J]. 经济评论, 2014(4): 3-16. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JJPL201404001.htm
    [28]
    温忠麟, 叶宝娟. 中介效应分析: 方法和模型发展[J]. 心理科学进展, 2014(5): 731-745. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XLXD201405001.htm
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Tables(3)

    Article Metrics

    Article Views(200) PDF Downloads(8) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return