Volume 41 Issue 2
Mar.  2026
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
WANG Guosong, CAO Lei, XU Lingli. The Impact of Digital Inclusive Finance on Residents' Income: Evidence from the Moderating Role of New-Quality Laborers[J]. Journal of Guangdong University of Finance & Economics, 2026, 41(2): 75-86.
Citation: WANG Guosong, CAO Lei, XU Lingli. The Impact of Digital Inclusive Finance on Residents' Income: Evidence from the Moderating Role of New-Quality Laborers[J]. Journal of Guangdong University of Finance & Economics, 2026, 41(2): 75-86.

The Impact of Digital Inclusive Finance on Residents' Income: Evidence from the Moderating Role of New-Quality Laborers

  • Received Date: 2025-10-21
    Available Online: 2026-05-15
  • Publish Date: 2026-03-28
  • As an important outcome of financial innovation in the digital era, digital inclusive finance can improve the effectiveness of financial services and create new opportunities for residents' income growth. Based on data from the China Household Finance Survey (CHFS), this study empirically examines the impact of digital inclusive finance on residents' income and investigates the moderating role played by new-quality laborers in this relationship. The results show that digital inclusive finance significantly promotes residents' income growth, while new-quality laborers exert a significant positive moderating effect in this process. These findings remain robust after addressing potential endogeneity and conducting a series of robustness checks. Mechanism analysis indicates that digital inclusive finance increases residents' income by expanding their access to financial information, improving their level of financial understanding, and strengthening their participation in financial activities. Heterogeneity analysis further reveals that the income effect of digital inclusive finance differs significantly across city clusters, across regions with different levels of the new-quality laborer index, and across income groups. In addition, digital inclusive finance significantly reduces residents' income inequality, whereas new-quality laborers exert a negative moderating effect in this process. These findings provide useful policy implications for improving the service system of digital inclusive finance, accelerating the cultivation of new-quality laborers, and promoting more coordinated regional development.
  • loading
  • [1]
    章贵军, 方若婷, 朱建平. 城乡居民共同富裕之路探究——基于"收入、消费和财富"不平等的测度与比较[J]. 当代经济研究, 2024(7): 88-104.
    [2]
    贝多广, 张锐. 包容性增长背景下的普惠金融发展战略[J]. 经济理论与经济管理, 2017(2): 5-12.
    [3]
    Lin H, Zhang Z J. The impacts of digital finance development on household income, consumption, and financial asset holding: an extreme value analysis of China's microdata[J]. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 2023, 27(4): 1607-1627. doi: 10.1007/s00779-022-01667-z
    [4]
    乔洪洋, 吴三忙. 数字经济赋能我国农村居民收入增长研究[J]. 西安财经大学学报, 2025(8): 1-21.
    [5]
    陈梦根, 周元任. 数字经济、分享发展与共同富裕[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2023, 40(10): 5-26.
    [6]
    李林玥. 数字经济发展助力农村居民增收: 作用机制与实证检验[J]. 改革, 2024(11): 57-71.
    [7]
    周佳宁, 张建锋, 王宁, 等. 包容性增长视角下数字普惠金融对灵活就业者收入的影响效应研究[J]. 财贸研究, 2025, 36(2): 12-28.
    [8]
    崔海洋, 袁倩莹. 数字金融、产业结构升级与包容性增长——基于区域和城乡协调发展的视角[J]. 云南民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2022, 39(5): 108-116.
    [9]
    程锐. 数字金融、融资困境与企业劳动收入份额[J]. 财经科学, 2024(1): 18-32.
    [10]
    李兰冰, 吴京洪. 数字经济与家庭收入包容性增长[J]. 广东财经大学学报, 2025, 40(4): 21-34. http://xb.gdufe.edu.cn/article/id/e8d9edaa-ae09-47b7-bbe7-405d3fce7483
    [11]
    张玉静, 涂圣伟. 数字普惠金融、农业要素配置效率与城乡居民收入差距——来自中国1572个县域的证据[J]. 南京农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2025, 25(1): 182-192.
    [12]
    郭劲光, 张景媛. 数字经济背景下技术创新是否有助于地区收入收敛?——基于研发要素流动的视角[J]. 兰州学刊, 2025(8): 1-21.
    [13]
    Zhan Y Q, Gao D F, Feng M Z, et al. Digital finance, non-agricultural employment, and the income-increasing effect on rural households[J]. International Review of Financial Analysis, 98 (2025): 103897. doi: 10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103897
    [14]
    高星. 新型城镇化、数字经济与共同富裕: 基于城乡收入分配视角[J]. 世界地理研究, 2025, 34(8): 101-113.
    [15]
    赵慧, 杨璐瑶, 郑瑞坤. 数字乡村建设对城乡居民收入差距收敛性的驱动机制[J]. 城市问题, 2025(1): 70-84.
    [16]
    徐彩瑶, 钱晨, 孔凡斌. 数字乡村建设能否缩小城乡收入差距——基于农业科技进步中介和门槛效应的实证检验[J]. 农业技术经济, 2024(12): 4-24.
    [17]
    王俊杰. 数字经济之于共同富裕: 效率还是公平?[J]. 浙江工商大学学报, 2024(4): 111-124.
    [18]
    孙伯驰, 尹含. 数字乡村发展能否促进农户共同富裕——基于收入增长与收入不平等的双重视角[J]. 华东经济管理, 2025, 39(6): 35-45.
    [19]
    王景圣, 孔令鹏. 数字鸿沟还是普惠红利——数字普惠金融对家族资产配置的影响与群体差异[J]. 统计研究, 2026, 43(1): 98-109.
    [20]
    曾永明, 潘丹, 汪瑶瑶, 等. 数字乡村建设促进了共同富裕吗——对农户收入增长与差距双重目标的考察[J]. 中国经济问题, 2024(6): 141-157.
    [21]
    洪俊杰, 李研, 杨曦. 数字经济与收入差距: 数字经济核心产业的视角[J]. 经济研究, 2024, 59(5): 116-131.
    [22]
    蒋永穆. 新质生产力理论对马克思主义生产力理论的继承和发展[J]. 经济学动态, 2025(5): 5-18.
    [23]
    杨云霞, 严晓红. 高素质劳动者在新质生产力中的战略定位与发展路径[J]. 西安财经大学学报, 2025, 38(4): 3-13.
    [24]
    洪银兴. 新质生产力及其培育和发展[J]. 经济学动态, 2024(1): 3-11.
    [25]
    胡莹, 方太坤. 再论新质生产力的内涵特征与形成路径——以马克思生产力理论为视角[J]. 浙江工商大学学报, 2024(2): 39-51.
    [26]
    简新华, 聂长飞. 中国新质生产力水平测度及省际现状的比较分析[J]. 经济学动态, 2024(10): 3-20.
    [27]
    吴雨, 李晓, 李洁, 等. 数字金融发展与家庭金融资产组合有效性[J]. 管理世界, 2021, 37(7): 92-104+7.
    [28]
    刘魏. 数字普惠金融对居民相对贫困的影响效应[J]. 华南农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2021, 20(6): 65-77.
    [29]
    郭沛瑶, 尹志超. 小微企业自主创新驱动力——基于数字普惠金融视角的证据[J]. 经济学动态, 2022(2): 85-104.
    [30]
    张勋, 杨桐, 汪晨, 等. 数字金融发展与居民消费增长: 理论与中国实践[J]. 管理世界, 2020, 36(11): 48-63.
    [31]
    黄群慧, 余泳泽, 张松林. 互联网发展与制造业生产率提升: 内在机制与中国经验[J]. 中国工业经济, 2019(8): 5-23.
    [32]
    江艇. 因果推断经验研究中的中介效应与调节效应[J]. 中国工业经济, 2022(5): 100-120.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Tables(9)

    Article Metrics

    Article Views(646) PDF Downloads(12) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return