Volume 41 Issue 2
Mar.  2026
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
ZHAO Weimin, XIE Qiang. Between 'Stabilizing Growth' and 'Safeguarding Livelihoods': How Fiscal Pressure Alters Local Financial Expenditure[J]. Journal of Guangdong University of Finance & Economics, 2026, 41(2): 43-59.
Citation: ZHAO Weimin, XIE Qiang. Between "Stabilizing Growth" and "Safeguarding Livelihoods": How Fiscal Pressure Alters Local Financial Expenditure[J]. Journal of Guangdong University of Finance & Economics, 2026, 41(2): 43-59.

Between "Stabilizing Growth" and "Safeguarding Livelihoods": How Fiscal Pressure Alters Local Financial Expenditure

  • Received Date: 2025-11-14
    Available Online: 2026-05-15
  • Publish Date: 2026-03-28
  • With the dual objectives of stabilizing growth and safeguarding livelihoods, how local governments adjust fiscal expenditure structure under tightening budget constraints has become a central issue in China's fiscal governance. Incorporating regional heterogeneity, this study examines the adjustment mechanisms of local expenditure strategies under different types of fiscal pressure. Both theoretical derivations and empirical evidence show that, under fiscal pressure induced by changes in the economic environment, local governments tend to reduce productive expenditure, and the reduction is larger in regions with lower capital stock and lower pre-existing productive expenditure. The direction of changes in transfer expenditure is uncertain and may shift from increase to decrease as the capital stock rises. Under the fiscal pressure induced by policy and institutional changes, productive expenditure also contracts, and the contraction is greater in regions with larger capital stock and greater pre-existing productive expenditure. Meanwhile, cuts in transfer expenditure become more pronounced as the capital stock and resource endowments increase. Numerical simulations reproduce these heterogeneous adjustment paths within the theoretical framework, thereby strengthening the mechanism-based credibility of the empirical findings. As the fiscal pressure on local governments is likely to persist in the foreseeable future, this study provides an analytical framework for understanding local expenditure behavior under pressure-driven fiscal incentives and constraints.
  • loading
  • [1]
    谢贞发, 彭鑫. 财政可持续能力: 定义、现实挑战与提升路径[J]. 财政研究, 2025(9): 17-32.
    [2]
    Mackay R C. The impact of fiscal stress on local government fiscal structures: an event study of the orange county bankruptcy[J]. Public Budgeting & Finance, 2017, 37(2): 102-124.
    [3]
    Thompson P N. Effects of fiscal stress labels on municipal government finances, housing prices, and the quality of public services: evidence from Ohio[J]. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 2017, 64(3): 98-116.
    [4]
    Skidmore M, Scorsone E. Causes and consequences of fiscal stress in Michigan cities[J]. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 2011, 41(4): 360-371. doi: 10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2011.02.007
    [5]
    Aikins S. Effects of intergovernmental revenue on local government draw on fiscal reserves: evidence from COVID-19 fiscal stress[J]. Local Government Studies, 2023, 35(6): 102-123.
    [6]
    Afonso A, Baxa J, Slavik M. Fiscal developments and financial stress: a threshold VAR analysis[J]. Empirical Economics, 2018, 54(2): 395-423. doi: 10.1007/s00181-016-1210-5
    [7]
    Croix D, Delavallade C. Growth, public investment and corruption with failing institutions[J]. Economics of Governance, 2009, 10(3): 187-219. doi: 10.1007/s10101-008-0057-4
    [8]
    Schweizer P, Juhola S. Navigating systemic risks: governance of and for systemic risks[J]. Global Sustainability, 2024, 7: 38-45. doi: 10.1017/sus.2024.30
    [9]
    Jimenez B S. Fiscal stress and the allocation of expenditure responsibilities between state and local governments: an exploratory study[J]. State and Local Government Review, 2009, 41(2): 81-94. doi: 10.1177/0160323X0904100202
    [10]
    Chung I H, Williams D. Local governments' responses to the fiscal stress label: the case of New York[J]. Local Government Studies, 2021, 47(5): 808-835. doi: 10.1080/03003930.2020.1797693
    [11]
    曹春方, 马连福, 沈小秀. 财政压力、晋升压力、官员任期与地方国企过度投资[J]. 经济学(季刊), 2014(3): 22-41.
    [12]
    詹新宇, 王蓉蓉. 财政压力、支出结构与公共服务质量——基于中国229个地级市面板数据的实证分析[J]. 改革, 2022(2): 111-126.
    [13]
    席鹏辉, 梁若冰, 谢贞发. 财政压力、产能过剩与供给侧改革[J]. 经济研究, 2017, 52(9): 86-102.
    [14]
    吴敏, 周黎安. 财政压力的多层级传递与应对——基于取消农业税改革的研究[J]. 世界经济文汇, 2020(1): 41-59.
    [15]
    余靖雯, 陈晓光, 龚六堂. 财政压力如何影响了县级政府公共服务供给?[J]. 金融研究, 2018(1): 18-35.
    [16]
    李芳林, 胡志龙. 城市土地绿色利用、产业结构升级与财政压力[J]. 国土资源科技管理, 2026, 43(1): 77-90.
    [17]
    徐超, 庞雨蒙, 刘迪. 地方财政压力与政府支出效率——基于所得税分享改革的准自然实验分析[J]. 经济研究, 2020, 55(6): 138-154.
    [18]
    杨得前, 汪鼎. 财政压力、省以下政府策略选择与财政支出结构[J]. 财政研究, 2021(8): 47-62.
    [19]
    孙开, 张磊. 分权程度省际差异、财政压力与基本公共服务支出偏向——以地方政府间权责安排为视角[J]. 财贸经济, 2019, 40(8): 18-32.
    [20]
    周绍东, 艾欣. 国家治理视域下地方财政转型: 职能、取向与路径[J]. 经济与管理, 2025, 39(4): 1-11.
    [21]
    祁毓, 廖嘉怡, 陈建伟, 等. 财政压力及其应对: 理论溯源、演化进展与研究启示[J]. 财政研究, 2023(4): 3-17.
    [22]
    吕冰洋, 胡深. 中国央地财政关系的演进: 一个理论框架[J]. 经济研究, 2024, 59(6): 69-87.
    [23]
    Cai H, Treisman D. Does competition for capital discipline governments? decentralization, globalization, and public policy[J]. American Economic Review, 2005, 95(3): 817-830. doi: 10.1257/0002828054201314
    [24]
    单豪杰. 中国资本存量K的再估算: 1952~2006年[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2008, 25(10): 17-31.
    [25]
    赵志耘, 刘晓路, 吕冰洋. 中国要素产出弹性估计[J]. 经济理论与经济管理, 2006(6): 5-11.
    [26]
    卞志村, 杨源源. 结构性财政调控与新常态下财政工具选择[J]. 经济研究, 2016, 51(3): 66-80.
    [27]
    王立勇, 纪尧. 财政政策波动性与财政规则: 基于开放条件DSGE模型的分析[J]. 经济研究, 2019, 54(6): 121-135.
    [28]
    Angrist J D, Pischke J S. Mastering 'metrics: The path from cause to effect[M]. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2014.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(3)  / Tables(8)

    Article Metrics

    Article Views(648) PDF Downloads(15) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return