Volume 42 Issue 3
May  2026
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
CHU Erming, ZHANG Yan, LI Yuan. Can the Agricultural Support Relending Promote Rural Residents' Non-Economic Collective Action: An Empirical Analysis Based on CLDS Data[J]. Journal of Guangdong University of Finance & Economics, 2026, 41(3): 49-64.
Citation: CHU Erming, ZHANG Yan, LI Yuan. Can the Agricultural Support Relending Promote Rural Residents' Non-Economic Collective Action: An Empirical Analysis Based on CLDS Data[J]. Journal of Guangdong University of Finance & Economics, 2026, 41(3): 49-64.

Can the Agricultural Support Relending Promote Rural Residents' Non-Economic Collective Action: An Empirical Analysis Based on CLDS Data

  • Received Date: 2025-12-18
    Available Online: 2026-06-26
  • Publish Date: 2026-05-28
  • The non-economic collective action of rural residents constitutes an indispensable component of rural public affairs governance and rural residents' spontaneous operations, and serves as a vital pathway toward comprehensive rural revitalization. Drawing on micro data from the China Labor-force Dynamics Survey (CLDS) and employing a panel fixed-effect model, this paper empirically investigates the effects and mechanisms of agricultural support relending. The findings reveal that agricultural support relending not only positively promotes the overall non-economic collective action of rural residents, but also exhibits varying degrees of facilitating effects on different types of collective action. Mechanism tests demonstrate that agricultural support relending plays a mediating role in fostering rural residents' non-economic collective action through three channels: raising rural residents' income levels, improving the construction and operation of rural infrastructure, and expanding the boundaries of villagers' social networks. Heterogeneity analysis indicates that the promoting effect of agricultural support relending on collective action is more pronounced among credit beneficiary groups and collective fund-raising participants, as well as in large villages and villages with moderate economic development. This paper provides micro-level evidence on the impact of agricultural support relending on rural residents' non-economic collective action, aiming to uncover the specific pathways through which financial instruments, by alleviating economic constraints, induce the accumulation of social capital and improvements in social governance. It thereby supplies a theoretical foundation and policy references for strengthening rural governance and advancing comprehensive rural revitalization.
  • loading
  • [1]
    欧阳静. 简约治理: 超越科层化的乡村治理现代化[J]. 中国社会科学, 2022(3): 145-163, 207.
    [2]
    渠敬东. 中国传统社会的双轨治理体系封建与郡县之辨[J]. 社会, 2016, 36(2): 1-31.
    [3]
    刘海, 杨丹, 刘自敏, 等. 包容性增长能促使农户参与非经济性集体行动吗——兼论中国精准扶贫政策实施的非经济效应[J]. 中国农村观察, 2024(6): 122-145.
    [4]
    段今颖, 施帝斌. "农民—文化"双重主体性视角下中国传统村落和美乡村建设[J]. 农村经济, 2025(4): 79-86.
    [5]
    王亚华, 高瑞, 孟庆国. 中国农村公共事务治理的危机与响应[J]. 清华大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2016, 31(2): 23-29, 195.
    [6]
    Zomeren M V, Spears R, Leach C W. Exploring psychological mechanisms of collective action: does relevance of group identity influence how people cope with collective disadvantage?[J]. British Journal of Social Psychology, 2008, 2: 353-372.
    [7]
    曾凡木. 制度供给与集体行动: 新乡贤参与社会治理共同体的路径分析[J]. 求实, 2022(2): 84-96, 112.
    [8]
    楚尔鸣, 李源, 易雨瑶, 等. 结构性货币政策能否提振农村居民消费?——基于支农再贷款的实证分析[J]. 中南大学学报(社会科学版), 2025, 31(1): 80-94.
    [9]
    Olson M. The logic of collective action: public goods and the theory of groups[M]. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1965.
    [10]
    Scott J C. The moral economy of the peasant: rebellion and subsistence in southeast Asia[M]. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1976.
    [11]
    Popkin S L. The rational peasant: the political economy of rural society in Vietnam[M]. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1979.
    [12]
    陈明銶. 晚清广东劳工"集体行动"理念初探[J]. 中国社会经济史研究, 1989(1): 70-77.
    [13]
    郑旭涛. 集体行动: 概念比较中的理解[J]. 探索, 2020(4): 64-75.
    [14]
    杨丹, 刘海, 章元. 共同富裕目标下农村居民收入差距与集体行动研究[J]. 经济学动态, 2023(5): 35-54.
    [15]
    王亚华, 臧良震. 小农户的集体行动逻辑[J]. 农业经济问题, 2020(1): 59-67.
    [16]
    吴理财, 李佳莹. 从"文字下乡"到"数字下乡"的百年乡村建设——基于政府治理的视角[J]. 中国农村观察, 2023(2): 2-15.
    [17]
    吴振其, 郭诚诚. 从高音喇叭到低声微信群: 乡村公共性再生产与社会治理转型——基于一个华北村庄的田野调查[J]. 中国农村观察, 2023(2): 34-52.
    [18]
    赵鼎新. 集体行动、搭便车理论与形式社会学方法[J]. 社会学研究, 2006(1): 1-21, 243.
    [19]
    张立, 王亚华. 集体经济如何影响村庄集体行动——以农村居民参与灌溉设施供给为例[J]. 中国农村经济, 2021(7): 44-64.
    [20]
    Congleton R D, Elinor Ostrom. Understanding institutional diversity[J]. Public Choice, 2007, 132(3): 509-511.
    [21]
    林朝颖, 林楠, 黄志刚, 等. 基于企业微观视角的定向降准惠农精准性研究[J]. 中国农村观察, 2020(6): 83-101.
    [22]
    刘澜飚, 尹海晨, 张靖佳. 中国结构性货币政策信号渠道的有效性研究[J]. 现代财经(天津财经大学学报), 2017, 37(3): 12-22.
    [23]
    邝雄, 郑远果. 支农再贷款结构性货币政策的有效性——基于金融CGE模型[J]. 系统科学与数学, 2024, 44(11): 3281-3297.
    [24]
    苏乃芳, 李宏瑾. 结构性货币政策: 理论基础与政策效果[J]. 经济社会体制比较, 2023(1): 32-43.
    [25]
    卞志村, 孟士清. 扩大内需、需求结构调整与我国货币政策工具[J]. 上海金融, 2014(4): 3-9, 116.
    [26]
    楚尔鸣, 曹策, 李逸飞. 结构性货币政策: 理论框架、传导机制与疏通路径[J]. 改革, 2019(10): 66-74.
    [27]
    陈凤. 数字治理破解乡村集体经济的发展困境[J]. 国土资源科技管理, 2026, 43(3): 113-120.
    [28]
    刘自强, 张天. 数字普惠金融对农民收入的影响及其空间溢出效应[J]. 当代经济研究, 2021(12): 93-102.
    [29]
    温涛, 王佐滕. 农村金融多元化促进农民增收吗?——基于农民创业的中介视角[J]. 农村经济, 2021(1): 94-103.
    [30]
    刘伟, 王灿, 赵晓军, 等. 中国收入分配差距: 现状、原因和对策研究[J]. 中国人民大学学报, 2018, 32(5): 25-43.
    [31]
    张军, 何寒熙. 中国农村的公共产品供给: 改革后的变迁[J]. 改革, 1996(5): 50-57.
    [32]
    Ostrom E, Chang C, Pennington M, et al. The future of the commons-beyond market failure and government regulation[J]. Institute of Economic Affairs Monographs, 2012, 12.
    [33]
    郭云南, 姚洋, Jeremy Foltz. 宗族网络与村庄收入分配[J]. 管理世界, 2014(1): 73-89, 188.
    [34]
    王丹利, 陈斌开. 公共基础设施社会参与的历史起源: 来自乡村水利建设的证据[J]. 世界经济, 2024, 47(3): 151-183.
    [35]
    王朝阳, 闵逸杰, 代伟. 结构性货币政策如何缓解中小企业融资困境——基于异质性银行视角的解释[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2024, 41(11): 67-88.
    [36]
    季小江, 杜三宝, 王冠东. 应用min-max标准化分析法测定区域经济增长差异——以陕西省榆林地区为例[J]. 经济与管理, 2016, 30(3): 54-56.
    [37]
    杨汝岱, 陈斌开, 朱诗娥. 基于社会网络视角的农户民间借贷需求行为研究[J]. 经济研究, 2011, 46(11): 116-129.
    [38]
    江艇. 因果推断经验研究中的中介效应与调节效应[J]. 中国工业经济, 2022(5): 100-120.
    [39]
    叶永卫, 云锋, 曾林. 容错纠错机制何以激励国企创新?[J]. 财经研究, 2022, 48(5): 95-109.
    [40]
    陆敏敏, 谢博钦. 失智症家庭照护者社会资本量表的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 护理学杂志, 2023, 38(23): 90-94.
    [41]
    贺雪峰. 中国区域差异中的文化核心区与边缘区[J]. 陕西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2020, 49(6): 23-29.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(1)  / Tables(10)

    Article Metrics

    Article Views(110) PDF Downloads(8) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return