Volume 41 Issue 2
Mar.  2026
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
ZENG Xianju, YAN Jiangbing, SHI Qing. Inherent Laws and Evolutionary Logic of the Qualitative Transition of Productivity: A Re-examination of the Development Strategies for New Quality Productive Forces[J]. Journal of Guangdong University of Finance & Economics, 2026, 41(2): 31-42.
Citation: ZENG Xianju, YAN Jiangbing, SHI Qing. Inherent Laws and Evolutionary Logic of the Qualitative Transition of Productivity: A Re-examination of the Development Strategies for New Quality Productive Forces[J]. Journal of Guangdong University of Finance & Economics, 2026, 41(2): 31-42.

Inherent Laws and Evolutionary Logic of the Qualitative Transition of Productivity: A Re-examination of the Development Strategies for New Quality Productive Forces

  • Received Date: 2025-11-06
    Available Online: 2026-05-15
  • Publish Date: 2026-03-28
  • Productivity as a complex open system, its qualitative state transition is the fundamental driving force for the evolution of social formations. Based on complex systems theory and integrating state transition logic, this paper constructs a three-dimensional analytical framework of "stage-dynamics-structure". By reviewing the historical process of successive industrial revolutions, it reveals the complex system evolution logic of "steady-state equilibrium → disequilibrium → new steady-state equilibrium" that qualitative state transitions of productivity follow, as well as the compound law of motion manifested as "stage evolution-driving force innovation-structure optimization". Based on the "stage-dynamics-structure" framework of productivity qualitative state transition, this study systematically analyzes the development characteristics of China's new quality productive forces, and proposes development suggestions featuring "dynamic adjustment according to stages, classified guidance according to driving forces, and targeted policy implementation according to structures". The analytical framework constructed in this paper enriches the systematic understanding of productivity development theory, and provides historical reference and practical guidance for the development of new quality productive forces in China.
  • loading
  • [1]
    马克思. 政治经济学批判[M]. 中共中央马克思恩格斯列宁斯大林著作编译局, 译. 北京: 人民出版社, 1976.
    [2]
    习近平. 发展新质生产力是推动高质量发展的内在要求和重要着力点[J]. 求是, 2024(11): 4-8.
    [3]
    王巍. 新质生产力形成的唯物史观依据[N]. 光明日报, 2024-05-20(15).
    [4]
    蔡继明, 高宏. 新质生产力参与价值创造的理论探讨和实践应用[J]. 经济研究, 2024, 59(6): 15-28.
    [5]
    方敏, 杨虎涛. 政治经济学视域下的新质生产力及其形成发展[J]. 经济研究, 2024, 59(3): 20-28.
    [6]
    任保平. 生产力现代化转型形成新质生产力的逻辑[J]. 经济研究, 2024, 59(3): 12-19.
    [7]
    贺俊. 新质生产力问题的理论缺口与经济学的"异质性"分析视角[J]. 财贸经济, 2024, 45(8): 13-21.
    [8]
    黄群慧. 新质生产力与新型工业化[J]. 中国社会科学, 2024(6): 19-26.
    [9]
    中国社会科学院经济研究所课题组, 黄群慧, 杨耀武, 等. 结构变迁、效率变革与发展新质生产力[J]. 经济研究, 2024, 59(4): 4-23.
    [10]
    黄群慧, 盛方富. 新质生产力系统: 要素特质、结构承载与功能取向[J]. 改革, 2024(2): 15-24.
    [11]
    曾宪聚, 施青. 新质生产力三维生成机制: 以深圳新能源汽车产业为例[J]. 科研管理, 2025, 46(4): 63-71.
    [12]
    Aghion P, Antonin C, Bunel S. The power of creative destruction: economic upheaval and the wealth of nations[M]. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2021.
    [13]
    Phillips P C B, Sul D. Transition modeling and econometric convergence tests[J]. Econometrica, 2007, 75(6): 1771-1855. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0262.2007.00811.x
    [14]
    方毅, 孟佶贤, 张屹山. 中国经济增长的状态跃迁(1979—2020)——基于复杂系统视角的研究[J]. 中国社会科学, 2022(5): 4-26, 204.
    [15]
    Foster R N. Working the s-curve: assessing technological threats[J]. Research Management, 1986, 29(5): 23-31
    [16]
    张会恒. 论产业生命周期理论[J]. 财贸研究, 2004(6): 7-11.
    [17]
    Aghion P, Howitt P. A model of growth through creative destruction[J]. Econometrica, 1992, 60(2): 323-351. doi: 10.2307/2951599
    [18]
    洪银兴. 新质生产力及其培育和发展. 经济学动态, 2024(1): 3-11.
    [19]
    马昀, 卫兴华. 用唯物史观科学把握生产力的历史作用[J]. 中国社会科学, 2013(11): 46-64, 203.
    [20]
    戚聿东, 徐凯歌. 技术革命、生产方式变革与企业组织结构调整[J]. 管理世界, 2024, 40(10): 1-16, 35.
    [21]
    贾根良. 第三次工业革命与工业智能化[J]. 中国社会科学, 2016(6): 87-106, 206.
    [22]
    谢伏瞻. 论新工业革命加速拓展与全球治理变革方向[J]. 经济研究, 2019, 54(7): 4-13.
    [23]
    Hobsbawm E. Industry and empire: the birth of the industrial revolution[M]. London: Penguin Books, 1999.
    [24]
    Hounshell D A. From the american system to mass production, 1800-1932: the development of manufacturing technology in the United States[M]. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1984.
    [25]
    Saxenian A. Regional advantage: culture and competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128[M]. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1994.
    [26]
    国家知识产权局.2024年中国知识产权强国建设进展情况[R/OL].(2025-04-24)[2026-03-07]. https://www.gov.cn/lianbo/bumen/202504/content_7020844.htm.
    [27]
    国家统计局, 科学技术部, 财政部.2024年全国科技经费投入统计公报[R/OL].(2025-09-29)[2026-03-16]. https://www.most.gov.cn/xxgk/xinxifenlei/fdzdgknr/kjtjbg/kjtj2025/202509/t20250930_194823.html.
    [28]
    张新宝. 论作为新型财产权的数据财产权[J]. 中国社会科学, 2023(4): 144-163, 207.
    [29]
    田轩.中国风投存续期仅为美国一半, 如何培养"耐心资本"[N/OL].(2026-01-15)[2026-03-05]. https://www.sohu.com/a/976375943_122014422.
    [30]
    曾宪聚, 施青. 我国新兴产业规模化发展: 内生动力与制度优化[J]. 深圳大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2026, 43(2): 1-10.
    [31]
    印剑, 夏惟怡, 曹向. 新质生产力赋能全球价值链跃升的理论逻辑与推进路径[J]. 广东财经大学学报, 2025, 40(2): 83-89.
    [32]
    徐明, 陈斯洁, 于静涛. 科技创新政策、研发投入与关键核心技术攻坚[J]. 中国工业经济, 2025(9): 118-136.
    [33]
    国家统计局.服务业实现较快增长发展质效持续提升[EB/OL].(2025-01-17)[2026-04-07]. https://www.stats.gov.cn/sj/sjjd/202501/t20250117_1958341.html.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(1)

    Article Metrics

    Article Views(604) PDF Downloads(13) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return