Environmental Regulation and ESG Performance of Heavy Polluting Firms

XU Hao-qing; LIN Hao-feng; XING Jie

Volume 39 Issue 1

Jan. 2024

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Journal of Guangdong University of Finance & Economics > 2024 > 39(1): 85-99

XU Hao-qing, LIN Hao-feng, XING Jie. Environmental Regulation and ESG Performance of Heavy Polluting Firms[J]. Journal of Guangdong University of Finance & Economics, 2024, 39(1): 85-99.

Citation:

XU Hao-qing, LIN Hao-feng, XING Jie. Environmental Regulation and ESG Performance of Heavy Polluting Firms[J]. Journal of Guangdong University of Finance & Economics, 2024, 39(1): 85-99.

XU Hao-qing, LIN Hao-feng, XING Jie. Environmental Regulation and ESG Performance of Heavy Polluting Firms[J]. Journal of Guangdong University of Finance & Economics, 2024, 39(1): 85-99.

Citation:

XU Hao-qing, LIN Hao-feng, XING Jie. Environmental Regulation and ESG Performance of Heavy Polluting Firms[J]. Journal of Guangdong University of Finance & Economics, 2024, 39(1): 85-99.

PDF( 0 KB)

Environmental Regulation and ESG Performance of Heavy Polluting Firms

1.
Institute of Economics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, Beijing 100005
2.
Business School, Lishui University, Lishui 323000
3.
School of Economics, University of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, Beijing 102488, China

Received Date: 2023-07-26
Publish Date: 2024-01-28

Abstract

Abstract

To a certain extent, ESG performance can not only measure the comprehensive level of listed companies, but also become an important standard to reflect the "Dual Carbon" goal and promote green and sustainable transformation. This paper takes the revision of the Environmental Protection Law in 2014 and the environmental protection regulations promulgated or revised by 17 provinces as a quasi-natural experiment, and uses the ESG score provided by Bloomberg to measure the ESG performance of listed companies. It analyzes the impact and internal mechanism of environmental regulation on the ESG performance of listed companies by DID. The research finds that environmental regulation significantly improves the ESG performance of heavy polluting listed companies, compared with non-heavy-polluting ones. As for sub-scores, environmental regulation has significantly promoted the environmental (E) and social (S) performance of listed companies, but no evidence of improvement in corporate governance (G) performance has been found. In addition, the heterogeneity analysis reveals that environmental regulations more significantly affect ESG performance of state-owned companies and listed companies with high R&D investment. Hence, governments should accelerate the standardization and compulsion of ESG information disclosure, and improve the quality of ESG information disclosed by listed companies. Meanwhile, governments should strengthen organizational leadership and improve relevant laws and regulations to encourage enterprises to actively practice ESG philosophy.
- environmental regulation,
- heavy polluting firm,
- ESG performance,
- innovation ability,
- green development

FullText(HTML)

References(32)

References

[1]	李小荣, 徐腾冲. 环境-社会责任-公司治理研究进展[J]. 经济学动态, 2022(8): 133-146.
[2]	FLAMMER C, BANSAL P. Does a long-term orientation create value? evidence from a regression discontinuity[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2017, 38(9): 1827-1847. doi: 10.1002/smj.2629
[3]	谢红军, 吕雪. 负责任的国际投资: ESG与中国OFDI[J]. 经济研究, 2022(3): 83-99.
[4]	邱牧远, 殷红. 生态文明建设背景下企业ESG表现与融资成本[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2019(3): 108-123.
[5]	NG A C, REZAEE Z. Business sustainability factors and stock price informativeness[J]. Journal of Corporate Finance, 2020, 64: 101688. doi: 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2020.101688
[6]	HUANG J, XU N, YU H. Pollution and performance: do investors make worse trades on hazy days?[J]. Management Science, 2020, 66(10): 4455-4476. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.2019.3402
[7]	PEDERSEN L H, FITZGIBBONS S, POMORSKI L. Responsible investing: the ESG-efficient frontier[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2021, 142(2): 572-597. doi: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2020.11.001
[8]	TANG D Y, ZHANG Y. Do shareholders benefit from green bonds?[J]. Journal of Corporate Finance, 2020, 61: 101427. doi: 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2018.12.001
[9]	王禹, 王浩宇, 薛爽. 税制绿色化与企业ESG表现——基于《环境保护税法》的准自然实验[J]. 财经研究, 2022(9): 47-62.
[10]	杜鹏程, 黄世军, 洪宇. 增值税留抵退税提高企业的ESG表现了吗?[J]. 珞珈管理评论, 2023(1): 131-150.
[11]	魏佳慧, 耿成轩. 环境规制能提高企业融资效率吗?——基于重污染行业和清洁能源行业的研究[J]. 济南大学学报: 社会科学版, 2022(3): 111-120.
[12]	方红星, 林婷, 许东彦. 中国环境信息规制的市场效应——基于股价崩盘风险的实证检验[J]. 财经研究, 2022(7): 63-78.
[13]	杨朝霞. 中国环境立法50年: 从环境法1.0到3.0的代际进化[J]. 北京理工大学学报: 社会科学版, 2022(3): 88-107.
[14]	唐国平, 李龙会, 吴德军. 环境管制、行业属性与企业环保投资[J]. 会计研究, 2013(6): 83-89.
[15]	方颖, 郭俊杰. 中国环境信息披露政策是否有效: 基于资本市场反应的研究[J]. 经济研究, 2018(10): 158-174.
[16]	唐松, 施文, 孙安其. 环境污染曝光与公司价值——理论机制与实证检验[J]. 金融研究, 2019(8): 133-150.
[17]	黎文靖, 路晓燕. 机构投资者关注企业的环境绩效吗?——来自我国重污染行业上市公司的经验证据[J]. 金融研究, 2015(12): 97-112.
[18]	ZERBIB O D. The effect of pro-environmental preferences on bond prices: evidence from green bonds[J]. Journal of Banking & Finance, 2019, 98: 39-60.
[19]	常莹莹, 曾泉. 环境信息透明度与企业信用评级——基于债券评级市场的经验证据[J]. 金融研究, 2019(5): 132-151.
[20]	LIOUI A, TARELLI A. Chasing the ESG factor[J]. Journal of Banking and Finance, 2022, 139(6): 106498.
[21]	AOUADI A, MARSAT S. Do ESG controversies matter for firm value? evidence from international data[J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2018, 151(4): 1027-1047. doi: 10.1007/s10551-016-3213-8
[22]	HENKE H M. The effect of social screening on bond mutual fund performance[J]. Journal of Banking & Finance, 2016, 67: 69-84.
[23]	范子英, 赵仁杰. 法治强化能够促进污染治理吗?——来自环保法庭设立的证据[J]. 经济研究, 2019(3): 21-37.
[24]	王珮, 杨淑程, 黄珊. 环境保护税对企业环境、社会和治理表现的影响研究——基于绿色技术创新的中介效应[J]. 税务研究, 2021(11): 50-56.
[25]	沈洪涛, 周艳坤. 环境执法监督与企业环境绩效: 来自环保约谈的准自然实验证据[J]. 南开管理评论, 2017(6): 73-82. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-3448.2017.06.008
[26]	赵阳, 沈洪涛, 刘乾. 中国的边界污染治理——基于环保督察中心试点和微观企业排放的经验证据[J]. 经济研究, 2021(7): 113-126.
[27]	叶金珍, 安虎森. 开征环保税能有效治理空气污染吗[J]. 中国工业经济, 2017(5): 54-74.
[28]	AROURI M E H, YOUSSEF A B, MHENNI H, et al. Energy consumption, economic growth and CO₂ emissions in Middle East and North African countries[J]. Energy policy, 2012, 45: 342-349. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.02.042
[29]	黄世忠. 支撑ESG的三大理论支柱[J]. 财会月刊, 2021(19): 3-10.
[30]	苏冬蔚, 连莉莉. 绿色信贷是否影响重污染企业的投融资行为?[J]. 金融研究, 2018(12): 123-137.
[31]	宋德勇, 朱文博, 丁海. 企业数字化能否促进绿色技术创新?——基于重污染行业上市公司的考察[J]. 财经研究, 2022(4): 34-48.
[32]	钟腾, 罗吉罡, 汪昌云. 地方政府人才引进政策促进了区域创新吗?——来自准自然实验的证据[J]. 金融研究, 2021(5): 135-152.