Volume 39 Issue 6
Nov.  2024
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
XIE Meng, WANG Yiqiu, XU Yang. Research on the Economic Effects of ESG Responsibility Fulfillment of Listed Companies: Based on Long Term and Dynamic Perspectives[J]. Journal of Guangdong University of Finance & Economics, 2024, 39(6): 54-72.
Citation: XIE Meng, WANG Yiqiu, XU Yang. Research on the Economic Effects of ESG Responsibility Fulfillment of Listed Companies: Based on Long Term and Dynamic Perspectives[J]. Journal of Guangdong University of Finance & Economics, 2024, 39(6): 54-72.

Research on the Economic Effects of ESG Responsibility Fulfillment of Listed Companies: Based on Long Term and Dynamic Perspectives

  • Received Date: 2024-09-21
    Available Online: 2024-12-28
  • Publish Date: 2024-11-28
  • ESG is based on a long-term value orientation, and how the implementation of ESG concepts affects the long-term value of enterprises is an important topic that needs to be studied at present. Based on the data of Chinese listed companies from 2015 to 2022, this study examines the impact of ESG performance on corporate performance from short-term and long-term, static and dynamic perspectives. Research has found that fulfilling ESG responsibilities by listed companies cannot improve corporate financial performance in the short term, but can improve long-term performance that represents the company's sustainable development ability. Companies can achieve financial performance improvement around the third year of ESG practice. The impact of fulfilling ESG responsibilities on corporate performance has a time lag and continuity. Enterprises fulfilling their ESG responsibilities mainly improve their long-term performance through two channels: promoting enterprise innovation and optimizing enterprise management. Heterogeneity analysis shows that compared to state-owned enterprises, enterprises with low executive shareholding and high media attention, fulfilling ESG responsibilities has a greater impact on non-state-owned enterprises, enterprises with high executive shareholding and high media attention. This article is of great significance for deepening insights into the ESG value creation mechanism.
  • loading
  • [1]
    李井林, 阳镇, 陈劲, 等. ESG促进企业绩效的机制研究——基于企业创新的视角[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2021(9): 19.
    [2]
    肖红军. 解构与重构: 重新认识ESG[J]. 暨南学报(哲学社会科学版), 2024(5): 84-107.
    [3]
    RUHAYA A, ALAM M M, JAMALIAH S, et al. The impacts of environmental, social, and governance factors on firm performance[J]. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 2018, 29(2): 182-194. doi: 10.1108/MEQ-03-2017-0033
    [4]
    DUQUE-GRISALES E, AGUILERA-CARACUEL J. Environmental, social and governance (ESG) scores and financial performance of multilatinas: moderating effects of geographic international diversification and financial slack[J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2021, 168(2): 315-334. doi: 10.1007/s10551-019-04177-w
    [5]
    李思慧, 郑素兰. ESG的实施抑制了企业成长吗?[J]. 经济问题, 2022(12): 81-89. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-972X.2022.12.jjwt202212010
    [6]
    BUCHANAN B, CAO C, CHEN C. Corporate social responsibility, firm value, and influential institutional ownership[J]. Social Science Electronic Publishing, 2018(52): 73-95.
    [7]
    邱牧远, 殷红. 生态文明建设背景下企业ESG表现与融资成本[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2019(3): 108-123.
    [8]
    王波, 杨茂佳. ESG表现对企业价值的影响机制研究——来自我国A股上市公司的经验证据[J]. 软科学, 2022(6): 78-84.
    [9]
    李思慧, 徐保昌. 实体突围: ESG表现与企业实业投资[J]. 现代经济探讨, 2024(10): 76-90.
    [10]
    FRIEDMAN M. The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits[J]. New York Times Magazine, 1970, 13(9): 122-126.
    [11]
    GIANNOPOULOS G, FAGERNES R V K, ELMARZOOKY M, et al. The ESG disclosure and the financial performance of Norwegian listed firms[J]. Journal of Risk Financial Management, 2022, 15(6): 237.
    [12]
    COELHO R, JAYANTILAL S, FERREIRA J J, et al. The impact of social responsibility on corporate financial performance: a systematic literature review[J]. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 2023, 30(4): 1535-1560.
    [13]
    ROJO-SUÁREZ J, ALONSO-CONDE A B. Short-run and long-run effects of ESG policies on value creation and the cost of equity of firms[J]. Economic Analysis and Policy, 2023(77): 599-616.
    [14]
    HART S L, AHUJA G. Does it pay to be green? an empirical examination of the relationship between emission reduction and firm performance[J]. Business Strategy and the Environment, 1996, 5(1): 30-37.
    [15]
    朱琳, 江轩宇, 伊志宏, 等. 经营杠杆影响企业创新吗[J]. 南开管理评论, 2021(6): 163-175.
    [16]
    方先明, 胡丁. 企业ESG表现与创新——来自A股上市公司的证据[J]. 经济研究, 2023(2): 91-106.
    [17]
    吴海风, 朱晓满. ESG与能源技术创新: 负担还是赋能?[J]. 经济与管理研究, 2024(10): 18-35.
    [18]
    林辉, 李唐蓉. 绿色发展、金融支持与企业价值——基于上市公司ESG的实证检验[J]. 现代经济探讨, 2023(2): 28-44.
    [19]
    林炳洪, 李秉祥. ESG责任履行对企业研发投入的影响——基于资源获取与资源配置视角[J]. 软科学, 2024(1): 61-66.
    [20]
    温素彬, 方苑. 企业社会责任与财务绩效关系的实证研究——利益相关者视角的面板数据分析[J]. 中国工业经济, 2008(10): 150-160.
    [21]
    罗进辉, 王雨婷, 刘海潮. ESG表现与家族企业长期导向[J]. 财贸研究, 2023(2): 78-96.
    [22]
    乔朋华, 张悦, 许为宾, 等. 管理者心理韧性、战略变革与企业成长——基于香港联合证券交易所中资上市公司的实证研究[J]. 管理评论, 2022(2): 269-280.
    [23]
    鲁晓东, 连玉君. 中国工业企业全要素生产率估计: 1999—2007[J]. 经济学(季刊), 2012(2): 541-558.
    [24]
    CINELLI C, HAZLETT C. Making sense of sensitivity: extending omitted variable bias[J]. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, 2020, 82(1): 39-67.
    [25]
    孟庆斌, 侯粲然. 社会责任履行与企业金融化——信息监督还是声誉保险[J]. 经济学动态, 2020(2): 45-58.
    [26]
    顾夏铭, 陈勇民, 潘士远. 经济政策不确定性与创新——基于我国上市公司的实证分析[J]. 经济研究, 2018(2): 109-123.
    [27]
    权小锋, 吴世农, 文芳. 管理层权力、私有收益与薪酬操纵[J]. 经济研究, 2010(11): 73-87.
    [28]
    陈琪. 环保投入能提高企业生产率吗——基于企业创新中介效应的实证分析[J]. 南开经济研究, 2020(6): 80-100.
    [29]
    杜勇, 马文龙. 机构共同持股与企业全要素生产率[J]. 上海财经大学学报, 2021(5): 81-95.
    [30]
    GAO H, HE J, LI Y. Media spotlight, corporate sustainability and the cost of debt[J]. Applied Economics, 2022, 54(34): 1-17.
    [31]
    FAMA E F, FISHER L, JENSEN M C, et al. The adjustment of stock prices to new information[J]. International Economic Review, 1969, 10(1): 1-21.
    [32]
    BINDER J. The event study methodology since 1969[J]. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 1998, 11: 111-137. http://www.onacademic.com/detail/journal_1000034803621510_7a71.html
    [33]
    DOBKIN C, FINKELSTEIN A, KLUENDER R, et al. The economic consequences of hospital admissions[J]. Social Science Electronic Publishing, 2016, 108(2): 308-352.
    [34]
    黄炜, 任昶宇, 周羿. 退休制度、劳动供给与收入消费动态[J]. 经济研究, 2023(1): 141-157.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(3)  / Tables(14)

    Article Metrics

    Article Views(11) PDF Downloads(1) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return