Volume 34 Issue 2
May  2021
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
DENG Lu, LIU Wei-tao. Technological Progress Trigger Trade Friction with China:Based on Industrial Level[J]. Journal of Guangdong University of Finance & Economics, 2019, 34(2): 4-16.
Citation: DENG Lu, LIU Wei-tao. Technological Progress Trigger Trade Friction with China:Based on Industrial Level[J]. Journal of Guangdong University of Finance & Economics, 2019, 34(2): 4-16.

Technological Progress Trigger Trade Friction with China:Based on Industrial Level

  • Received Date: 2019-02-25
    Available Online: 2021-05-29
  • Publish Date: 2019-04-28
  • Increasing trade friction with China is an inevitable phenomenon while China has been integrated deeply into global economy. Technological progress in a certain industry or product may bring comparative advantages to a country's export, but it will also lead to trade frictions between countries. Based on data of trade remedies towards China from 12 important trade partners from 1996 to 2014, this paper empirically examines the impact of trade frictions caused by technological progress in China's industries at industrial level.The results show that the higher the technological progress of the industry is, the greater the possibility that the industry will encounter trade remedies from other countries; the effects of technological progress on trade remedies are characterized by industry heterogeneity and country heterogeneity; the effects of technological progress on trade remedies are more significant in technology-intensive industries and emerging industries; industries with large imports and high import penetration are more likely to suffer real implementation of trade remedies; and developed countries are more sensitive to China's technological progress. In order to cope with frequent trade frictions, China should take advantage of WTO trade dispute mechanism, avoid using policies that easily lead to trade remedies, strengthen self-dependent innovation, enhance the cost-effective advantage of export products, and proactively explore more emerging trade markets.
  • loading
  • [1]
    GROSSMAN G M, HELPMAN E. Protection for sale[J]. American Economic Review, 1994, 84(4): 833-850。.
    [2]
    PRUSA T J. Anti-dumping: a growing problem in international trade[J]. World Economy, 2005, 28(5): 683-700. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9701.2005.00700.x
    [3]
    魏国学, 熊启泉.美中贸易摩擦不断的原因——基于美中贸易现状的模型分析[J].世界经济研究, 2006(3): 39-44. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-6964.2006.03.006
    [4]
    郎丽华.中美贸易失衡的原因、影响与政策建议[J].经济与管理研究, 2006(7): 31-34. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JJYG200607007.htm
    [5]
    PRUSA T, SKEATH S. The economic and strategic motives for antidumping filings[J]. Review of World Economics(Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), 2002, 138(3): 389-413. doi: 10.1007/BF02707946
    [6]
    DEARDORFF A V, STERN R M. A centennial of anti-dumping legislation and implementation: introduction and overview[J]. World Economy, 2005, 28(5): 633-640. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9701.2005.00696.x
    [7]
    沈国兵.美国对中国反倾销的宏观决定因素及其影响效应[J].世界经济, 2007(11): 11-23. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SJJJ200711004.htm
    [8]
    黄晓凤.国际产业结构的趋同与贸易摩擦的博弈分析[J].财经理论与实践, 2007(1): 95-99. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CLSJ200701019.htm
    [9]
    柳剑平, 张兴泉.产业内贸易、产业结构差异与中美贸易摩擦——与中日贸易摩擦的比较分析[J].世界经济研究, 2011(5): 27-32. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JING201105005.htm
    [10]
    NIELS G, FRANCOIS J. Business cycles, the exchange rate, and demand for antidumping protection in mexico[J]. Review of Development Economics, 2010, 10(3): 388-399. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9361.2006.00339.x
    [11]
    李坤望, 王孝松.申诉者政治势力与美国对华反倾销的歧视性:美国对华反倾销裁定影响因素的经验分析[J].世界经济, 2008(6): 3-16. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SJJJ200806004.htm
    [12]
    王孝松, 谢申祥.发展中大国间贸易摩擦的微观形成机制——以印度对华反倾销为例[J].中国社会科学, 2013(9): 86-107. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZSHK201309008.htm
    [13]
    谢建国.经济影响、政治分歧与制度摩擦——美国对华贸易反倾销实证研究[J].管理世界, 2006(12): 8-17. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GLSJ200612001.htm
    [14]
    李春顶.中美贸易摩擦成因中的心理、制度和政治因素分析[J].财贸研究, 2007(3): 50-56. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CMYJ200703009.htm
    [15]
    PRUSA T J, SKEATH S. Modern commercial policy: managed trade or retaliation?[R]. Wellesley College Working Paper, 2002.
    [16]
    鲍晓华.中国是否遭遇了歧视性反倾销?——兼与其他出口国的比较[J].管理世界, 2011(3): 32-43. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GLSJ201103005.htm
    [17]
    HICKS J R. An inaugural lecture[J]. Oxford Economic Papers, 1953, 5(2): 117-135.
    [18]
    DORNBUSCH R, SAMUELSON P A. Comparative advantage, trade, and payments in a ricardian model with a continuum of goods[J]. American Economic Review, 1977, 67(5): 823-839.
    [19]
    GOMORY R E, W J BAUMOL. Global trade and conflicting national interests[M]. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 2000.
    [20]
    SAMUELSON P A. Where ricardo and mill rebut and confirm arguments of mainstream economists supporting globalization[J]. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2004, 18(3): 135-146. http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/aea/jep/2004/00000018/00000003/art00007
    [21]
    胡方, 彭诚.技术进步引起国际贸易摩擦的一个模型[J].国际贸易问题, 2009(9): 61-67. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GJMW200909010.htm
    [22]
    梁俊伟, 代中强.发展中国家对华反倾销动因:基于宏微观的视角[J].世界经济, 2015(11): 90-116. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SJJJ201511006.htm
    [23]
    邵金菊, 姜丽花.技术进步对国际贸易摩擦的影响研究[J].财政监督, 2016(10): 101-109. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CZJD201610028.htm
    [24]
    杨飞, 孙文远, 程瑶.技术赶超是否引发中美贸易摩擦[J].中国工业经济, 2018(10): 99-117. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GGYY201810007.htm
    [25]
    黄先海, 宋学印.准前沿经济体的技术进步路径及动力转换——从"追赶导向"到"竞争导向"[J].中国社会科学, 2017(6): 60-79. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZSHK201706004.htm
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(1)  / Tables(4)

    Article Metrics

    Article Views(272) PDF Downloads(26) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return