Coordination and Optimization of Legal System for Building Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area Construction under CEPA Framework

ZHONG Li-guo

Volume 35 Issue 5

Apr. 2021

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Journal of Guangdong University of Finance & Economics > 2020 > 35(5): 89-100

ZHONG Li-guo. Coordination and Optimization of Legal System for Building Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area Construction under CEPA Framework[J]. Journal of Guangdong University of Finance & Economics, 2020, 35(5): 89-100.

Citation:

ZHONG Li-guo. Coordination and Optimization of Legal System for Building Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area Construction under CEPA Framework[J]. Journal of Guangdong University of Finance & Economics, 2020, 35(5): 89-100.

Citation:

PDF( 969 KB)

Coordination and Optimization of Legal System for Building Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area Construction under CEPA Framework

ZHONG Li-guo

School of Law, Guangdong University of Finance and Economics, Guangzhou 510320, China

Received Date: 2020-06-17
Available Online: 2021-04-29
Publish Date: 2020-10-28

Abstract

Abstract

CEPA is an indispensable and vital platform for the construction of Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area(abbr. GBA). As a free trade agreement signed between the Mainland, Hong Kong, and Macau, CEPA has established a solid legal foundation for special preferential trade treatment among these areas, which facilitates the liberalization of trade and investment and promotes the free flow of production factors between the three regions. By merging the three CEPAs into one, adding new issues such as competition policy and environmental protection, improving existing trade and investment rules, and giving Guangdong province more power to conduct first, CEPA shall play a more important role in the construction of the GBA.
- Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area,
- CEPA,
- trade agreement,
- customs area,
- legal system,
- economic construction

FullText(HTML)

References(22)

References

[1]	余劲松. 国际经济法学[M]. 2版. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2019: 23.
[2]	何力. 国际贸易法的关境本位[J]. 国际贸易法论丛, 2018(8): 87-96.
[3]	曹建明, 贺小勇. 世界贸易组织[M]. 3版. 北京: 法律出版社, 2011: 93-94.
[4]	黄瑞, 肖萍. "一国两制"下港澳法律之比较[J]. 江西社会科学, 2001(7): 129-131. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JXSH200107039.htm
[5]	屈子力. 内生交易费用与区域经济一体化[J]. 南开经济研究, 2003(2): 67-70. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NKJJ200302016.htm
[6]	黄家明, 方卫东. 交易费用理论: 从科斯到威廉姆森[J]. 合肥工业大学学报: 社会科学版, 2000(1): 33-36. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HFGS200001010.htm
[7]	柯静嘉. 粤港澳大湾区投资合作的法律机制及其构建[J]. 广东财经大学学报, 2018(5): 83-95. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SONG201805012.htm
[8]	PETER UIMONEN, ARVIND SUBRAMANIAN, NAHEED KIRMANI, et al. International trade policies: the uruguay round and beyond(volumeⅡ)[M]. Washington: International Monetary Fund, 1995: 90.
[9]	钟立国. 内地与香港更紧密经贸关系安排法律问题研究[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2007: 41.
[10]	CHARLES P KINDLEBERGER. European in integration and international corporation[J]. Columbia Journal of World Business, 1966, 1: 65-73. http://www.researchgate.net/publication/292003003_European_integration_and_the_international_corporation
[11]	钟立国. 区域贸易协定原产地规则: 标准、功能及其协调[J]. 世界贸易组织动态与研究, 2007(2): 34-40.
[12]	罗先云. 论区域自由贸易协定中优惠原产地规则对国际直接投资流向的影响[J]. 河南财经政法大学学报, 2014(6): 116-120. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SZFG201406016.htm
[13]	朱兆敏. 论自由贸易区框架下服务提供者的身份识别[J]. 暨南学报: 哲学社会科学版, 2008(4): 64-71. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JNXB200804010.htm
[14]	谢伟. 粤港澳大湾区环境行政执法协调研究[J]. 广东社会科学, 2018(3): 246-253. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GDSK201803029.htm
[15]	马盈盈. 服务贸易自由化与全球价值链: 参与度及分工地位[J]. 国际贸易问题, 2019(7): 113-127. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GJMW201907008.htm
[16]	LUCIAN CERNAT. Eager to ink, but ready to act? RTA proliferation and international cooperation on competition policy[M]∥PHILIPPE BRUSICK et al. Competition provisions in regional trade agreements: how to assure development gains. New York and Geneva: United Nations, 2005: 4.
[17]	S EVENETT. Can developing economies benefit from WTO negotiations on binding disciplines for hard core cartels[M]. New York and Geneva: United Nations, 2003: 5-18.
[18]	TRUDI HARTZENBERG. Competition policy in SADC[R]. Muldersdrift: Trade and Industrial Policy Stategies Annual Forum, 2002: 1-7.
[19]	CHRISTIAN CONRAD. Dumping and anti-dumping measures from a competition and allocation perspective[J]. Journal of World Trade, 2002(3): 563, 572, 574. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=trueu0026db=buhu0026AN=7236492u0026site=ehost-live
[20]	朱源. 新型自贸协定的环保议题谈判及我国的对策[J]. 中国环境管理干部学院学报, 2014(1): 1-3, 7. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HJGL201401002.htm
[21]	朱雅妮. 从《跨太平洋伙伴协议》看美国区域贸易协定环境议题的发展[J]. 湖南大学学报: 社会科学版, 2015(5): 156-160. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HDXB201505027.htm
[22]	黄晓慧. CEPA框架下粤港环保合作的趋势与障碍的法律分析[J]. 广东社会科学, 2016(6): 243-251. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GDSK201606028.htm