On the Delimitation of Data Rights and System Construction of the Protection and Utilization of Data under the "Calabresi-Melamed Framework"

CUI Shu-jie

Volume 35 Issue 6

Apr. 2021

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Journal of Guangdong University of Finance & Economics > 2020 > 35(6): 78-87

CUI Shu-jie. On the Delimitation of Data Rights and System Construction of the Protection and Utilization of Data under the 'Calabresi-Melamed Framework'[J]. Journal of Guangdong University of Finance & Economics, 2020, 35(6): 78-87.

Citation:

CUI Shu-jie. On the Delimitation of Data Rights and System Construction of the Protection and Utilization of Data under the "Calabresi-Melamed Framework"[J]. Journal of Guangdong University of Finance & Economics, 2020, 35(6): 78-87.

Citation:

PDF( 1090 KB)

On the Delimitation of Data Rights and System Construction of the Protection and Utilization of Data under the "Calabresi-Melamed Framework"

CUI Shu-jie

School of Law, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710049, China

Received Date: 2020-08-07
Available Online: 2021-04-26
Publish Date: 2020-12-28

Abstract

Abstract

The delimitation of data rights is the core of data protection and utilization in the big data era, but it hasn't been regulated in China's current legal system. It is essential to identify and distinguish the data rights and interests in the procedure of data processing. Through the analysis of the different rights and interests of data, it can be concluded that there are personal data within personality right owned by individuals, and derived data within property right obtained by data processor, and public data within public interests regarded as public goods and controlled by government. Based on the notion of the effect of data rights protection as the core, "Calabresi-Melamed framework"is employed to construct the protection and utilization rules, including the data property rules to divide the data interests in the procedure of data processing, and the liability rules to promote data utilization and to realize remedy, and the regulation rules to establish regulating norms, restrictions and penalties for conduct.
- data rights,
- data security,
- data personality right,
- data property right,
- public interests,
- Calabresi-Melamed framework

FullText(HTML)

References(42)

References

[1]	姬蕾蕾. 大数据时代数据权属研究进展与评析[J]. 图书馆, 2019(2): 27-32. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TSGT201902005.htm
[2]	李岩. "虚拟财产权"的证立与体系安排——兼评《民法总则》第127条[J]. 法学, 2017(9): 145-157. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FXZZ201709014.htm
[3]	彭诚信, 向秦. "信息"与"数据"的私法界定[J]. 河南社会科学, 2019(11): 25-37. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HNSH201911007.htm
[4]	LAWRENCE LESSIG. The future of ideas: the fate of the commons in a connected world[M]. New York: Random House, 2001: 23-25.
[5]	肖冬梅, 文禹衡. 数据权谱系论纲[J]. 湘潭大学学报: 哲学社会科学版, 2015(6): 69-75. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5981.2015.06.014
[6]	杨立新. 衍生数据的法律属性与权利性质[EB/OL]. (2017-01-15)[2020-07-30]. http://www.a-site.cn/article/382113.html.
[7]	龙卫球. 数据新型财产权构建及其体系研究[J]. 政法论坛, 2017(4): 63-77. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0208.2017.04.006
[8]	李扬, 李晓宇. 大数据时代企业数据权益的性质界定及其保护模式建构[J]. 学海, 2019(4): 180-186. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-9790.2019.04.025
[9]	FRANK H EASTERBROOK. Cyberspace and the law of the horse[J]. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1996, 1996: 207-216. http://heinonlinebackup.com/hol-cgi-bin/get_pdf.cgi?handle=hein.journals/uchclf1996&section=9
[10]	ANUPAM CHANDER. How law made silicon valley[J]. Emory Law Journal, 2014, 63(3): 639-694. http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2340197
[11]	宋亚辉. 个人信息的私法保护模式研究——《民法总则》第111条的解释论[J]. 比较法研究, 2019(2): 86-103. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BJFY201902007.htm
[12]	李谦. 法律如何处理数据财产——从数据库到大数据[J]. 法律和社会科学, 2016(1): 73-100.
[13]	PAUL OHM. Broken promises of privacy: responding to the surprising failure of anonymization[J]. UCLA Law Review, 2010, 57(6): 1701-1778. http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=1450006
[14]	龙卫球. 再论企业数据保护的财产权化路径[J]. 东方法学, 2018(3): 50-63. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-1466.2018.03.006
[15]	PAUL M SCHWARTZ, DANIEL J SOLOVE. Reconciling personal information in the United States and European Union[J]. California Law Review, 2014, 102(4): 887-916. http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2271442
[16]	PETER K YU. Data producer's right and the protection of machine-generated data[J]. Tulane Law Review, 2019, 93(4): 859-930.
[17]	IVAN STEPANOV. Introducing a property right over data in the EU: the data producer's right-an evaluation[J]. International Review of Law, Computers & amp; Technology, 2020, 34(1): 65-86. http://www.researchgate.net/publication/347854557_A_Developmental_Step_in_the_Right_Direction_The_Case_for_Concept-Based_Instruction_in_the_Omani_ESP_Classroom/download
[18]	吴文嫔. 第三人利益合同原理与制度论[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2009: 257-268.
[19]	罗斯科·庞德. 通过法律的社会控制[M]. 沈宗灵, 董世忠, 译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 1984: 81-84.
[20]	石丹. 大数据时代数据权属及其保护路径研究[J]. 西安交通大学学报: 社会科学版, 2018(3): 78-85. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XAJD201803010.htm
[21]	程啸. 论大数据时代的个人数据权利[J]. 中国社会科学, 2018(3): 102-122. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZSHK201803010.htm
[22]	纪海龙. 数据的私法定位与保护[J]. 法学研究, 2018(6): 72-91. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LAWS201806005.htm
[23]	蒋晓丽, 林正. 传播隐私管理视阈下社会化媒体个人信息分享的边际困境[J]. 湖南科技大学学报: 社会科学版, 2019(1): 145-153. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XTGS201901020.htm
[24]	王秀秀. 个人数据权: 社会利益视域下的法律保护模式[D]. 上海: 华东政法大学博士论文, 2016.
[25]	高富平. 个人信息使用的合法性基础——数据上利益分析视角[J]. 比较法研究, 2019(2): 72-85. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BJFY201902006.htm
[26]	王利明. 中华人民共和国民法总则详解: 上册[M]. 北京: 中国法制出版社, 2017: 456.
[27]	项定宜. 论个人信息财产权的独立性[J]. 重庆大学学报: 社会科学版, 2018(6): 169-180. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CDSK201806016.htm
[28]	谢远扬. 信息论视角下个人信息的价值——兼对隐私权保护模式的检讨[J]. 清华法学, 2015(3): 94-110. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QHFX201503006.htm
[29]	张新宝. 《民法总则》个人信息保护条文研究[J]. 中外法学, 2019(1): 54-75. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-WFXZ201901006.htm
[30]	杨立新, 陈小江. 衍生数据是数据专有权的客体[EB/OL]. (2016-07-13)[2020-08-01]. http://orig.cssn.cn/sf/bwsf_fx/201607/t20160713_3120938_1.shtml?COLLCC=135990388&.
[31]	约翰·洛克. 政府论: 下篇[M]. 叶启芳, 瞿菊农, 译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 1964: 6-25.
[32]	韩旭至. 大数据时代下匿名信息的法律规制[J]. 大连理工大学学报: 社会科学版, 2018(4): 64-75. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DLGD201804009.htm
[33]	李丹. 算法共谋: 边界的确定及其反垄断法规制[J]. 广东财经大学学报, 2020(2): 103-112. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SONG202002010.htm
[34]	保罗·萨缪尔森, 威廉·诺德豪斯. 经济学[M]. 萧琛, 译. 北京: 人民邮电出版社, 2008: 32.
[35]	马克思, 恩格斯. 马克思恩格斯全集: 第46卷: 上册[M]. 北京: 人民出版社, 1979: 102-103.
[36]	PAUL M SCHWARTZ. Property, privacy, and personal data[J]. Harvard Law Review, 2004, 117(7): 2056-2128.
[37]	GUIDO CALABRESI, DOUGLAS A MELAMED. Property rules, liability rules, and inalienability: one view of the cathedral[J]. Harvard Law Review, 1972, 85(6): 1089-1128. http://jla.oxfordjournals.org/external-ref?access_num=10.2307/1340059&link_type=DOI
[38]	凌斌. 法律救济的规则选择: 财产规则、责任规则与卡梅框架的法律经济学重构[J]. 中国法学, 2012(6): 5-25. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGFX201206003.htm
[39]	郭洁, 姚宇. 卡-梅框架下我国物权保护规则的配置研究[J]. 政法论丛, 2017(6): 12-21. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZFLC201706002.htm
[40]	ADAM B THIMMESCH. Transacting in data: tax, privacy, and the new economy[J]. Denver Law Review, 2016, 94(1): 145-194. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2645078
[41]	肖冬梅, 文禹衡. 法经济学视野下数据保护的规则适用与选择[J]. 法律科学, 2016(6): 119-127. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DOUB201606012.htm
[42]	孟小峰, 朱敏杰, 刘立新, 等. 数据垄断与其治理模式研究[J]. 信息安全研究, 2019(9): 789-797. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XAQY201909004.htm