Volume 35 Issue 1
May  2021
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
XU Wen. On the Developing Deviation and Classified Correction of Sharing Platform[J]. Journal of Guangdong University of Finance & Economics, 2020, 35(1): 67-79.
Citation: XU Wen. On the Developing Deviation and Classified Correction of Sharing Platform[J]. Journal of Guangdong University of Finance & Economics, 2020, 35(1): 67-79.

On the Developing Deviation and Classified Correction of Sharing Platform

  • Received Date: 2019-10-27
    Available Online: 2021-05-15
  • Publish Date: 2020-01-28
  • As the operation hub of the sharing economy, the different positioning of each sharing platform determines the difference of their operation modes. Based on the user agreements of "Di Di", "Airbnb", "ofo"and"GoFun", the sharing platform can be classified into Mutual-Benefit Sharing Platform and Managing-Only Sharing Platform. Sharing economy is featured with fetishism, which has deviated the sharing platform from innovation-oriented and entrepreneurship-oriented direction to profit-seeking and arbitrage-seeking direction. To correct this deviation, the existed customized scheme, legislation scheme, experimental scheme, dual-track scheme, and marketization scheme can hardly satisfy criterion of effectiveness, feasibility, economy and flexibility simultaneously, let alone applying different schemes to different sharing platform.In order to take into account the development needs of the sharing economy industry as well as the legitimate interests of stakeholders, it is advisable to apply the platform-enabling scheme, which is based on data protocol, to Mutual-Benefit Sharing Platform, and it is advisable to apply the separation of two rights scheme, which is derived upon BOT agreement, to Managing-Only Sharing Platform.
  • loading
  • [1]
    DIANA CAO. Regulation through deregulation: sharing economy companies gaining legitimacy by circumventing traditional frameworks[J]. Hastings law journal, 2017, 68(5): 1085. http://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_law_journal/vol68/iss5/3
    [2]
    MICHAEL WIDENER. Shared spatial regulation in sharing-economy districts[J]. Seton hall law review, 2015, 46(1): 111-112. http://works.bepress.com/mnwidener/22/
    [3]
    HANNAH POSEN. Ridesharing in the sharing economy: should regulators impose uber regulations on uber[J]. Iowa law review, 2015, 101(1): 416. http://www.researchgate.net/publication/287819178_Ridesharing_in_the_Sharing_Economy_Should_Regulators_Impose_Uber_Regulations_on_Uber
    [4]
    刘晋炜. 新时代我国共享发展制度体系构建的三重逻辑[J]. 贵州社会科学, 2018(3): 117-120. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GZSK201803016.htm
    [5]
    MEAGHAN MURPHY. Cities as the original sharing platform: regulation of the new sharing economy[J]. Journal of business & technology law, 2016, 12(1): 128, 130-131. http://digitalcommons.law.umaryland.edu/jbtl/vol12/iss1/7
    [6]
    JANELLE ORSI. Practicing law in the sharing economy: helping people build cooperatives social enterprise and local sustainable economies[M]. New York: American Bar Association, 2012: 262.
    [7]
    EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT. The cost of Non-Europe in the sharing economy: economic, social and legal challenges and opportunities[EB/OL](2016-01-01)[2019-08-01]. www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank.
    [8]
    K FRENKEN, T MEELEN, M ARETS. Smarter regulation for the sharing economy[R]. The Guardian, 2015, May: 20.
    [9]
    BENJAMIN EDELMAN, DAMIEN GERADIN. Efficiencies & regulatory shortcuts: how should we regulate companies like Airbnb and Uber?[J]. Stanford technology law review, 2016, 19(2): 293.
    [10]
    ABBEY STEMLER. Betwixt and between: regulating the shared economy[J]. Fordham urban law journal, 2016, 43(1): 31-58. http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2535656
    [11]
    卡尔·马克思. 资本论[M]. 朱登, 译. 北京: 北京联合出版公司, 2013: 30.
    [12]
    SHELLY KREICZER-LEVY. Consumption property in the sharing economy[J]. Pepperdine law review, 2015, 43(1): 62-63. http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2639552
    [13]
    STEPHEN MILLER. First principles for regulating the sharing economy[J]. Harvard journal on legislation, 2016, 53(1): 161-162. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2568016
    [14]
    JORDAN BARRY, PAUL CARON. Tax regulation, transportation innovation, and the sharing economy[J]. University of chicago law review dialogue, 2016, 82: 71-75. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2538947
    [15]
    DEEAPA DAS ACEVEDO. Unbundling freedom in the sharing economy[J]. Southern california law review, 2018, 91(5): 795.
    [16]
    EREZ ALONI. Pluralizing the sharing economy[J]. Washington law review, 2016, 91(4): 1419. http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2757262
    [17]
    DANIEL MCDONALD. Reputation will teach the sharing economy to share[J]. University of florida journal of law and public policy, 2016, 27(2): 229-232. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2732269
    [18]
    BRYAN SCHWARTZ, ELLIE EINARSON. The disruptive force of the sharing economy[J]. Asper review of international business and trade law, 2018, 18(1): 245. http://www.zhangqiaokeyan.com/academic-journal-foreign_other_thesis/0204112571153.html
    [19]
    GABRIEL DOMENECH-PASCUAL. Sharing economy and regulatory strategies towards legal change[J]. European journal of risk regulation, 2016, 7(4): 722. http://journals.cambridge.org/abstract_S1867299X0001014X
    [20]
    RONALD GILSON, HENRY HANSMANN, MARIANA PARGENDLER, Regulatory dualism as a development strategy: corporate reform in Brazil, the United States and the European Union[J]. Stanford law review, 2011, 63(3): 479.
    [21]
    BRYAN WILSON, SAL CALI. Smarter cities, smarter regulations: a case for the algorithmic regulation of platform-based sharing economy firms[J]. UMKC law review, 2017, 85(4): 856.
    [22]
    WALTER MANER. Is computer ethics unique?[J]. Science and engineering ethics, 1996, 2(2): 137-141.
    [23]
    RASHMI DYAL-CHAND. Regulating sharing: the sharing economy as an alternative capitalist system[J]. Tulane law review, 2015, 90(2): 306-307. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2743959
    [24]
    JEREMY RIFKIN. The age of access: the new culture of hypercapitalism where all of life is a paid-for experience[M]. New York: Putnam Publishing Group, 2000: 5-6.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(3)  / Tables(6)

    Article Metrics

    Article Views(112) PDF Downloads(10) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return