How Does ESG Performance Empower the Financing Efficiency of Manufacturing Enterprises

ZHOU Li; CAO Jiayi

Volume 39 Issue 6

Nov. 2024

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Journal of Guangdong University of Finance & Economics > 2024 > 39(6): 87-102

ZHOU Li, CAO Jiayi. How Does ESG Performance Empower the Financing Efficiency of Manufacturing Enterprises[J]. Journal of Guangdong University of Finance & Economics, 2024, 39(6): 87-102.

Citation:

ZHOU Li, CAO Jiayi. How Does ESG Performance Empower the Financing Efficiency of Manufacturing Enterprises[J]. Journal of Guangdong University of Finance & Economics, 2024, 39(6): 87-102.

ZHOU Li, CAO Jiayi. How Does ESG Performance Empower the Financing Efficiency of Manufacturing Enterprises[J]. Journal of Guangdong University of Finance & Economics, 2024, 39(6): 87-102.

Citation:

ZHOU Li, CAO Jiayi. How Does ESG Performance Empower the Financing Efficiency of Manufacturing Enterprises[J]. Journal of Guangdong University of Finance & Economics, 2024, 39(6): 87-102.

PDF( 1389 KB)

How Does ESG Performance Empower the Financing Efficiency of Manufacturing Enterprises

ZHOU Li,
CAO Jiayi

Lanzhou University of Finance and Economics, Lanzhou 730030, China

Received Date: 2024-07-11
Available Online: 2024-12-28
Publish Date: 2024-11-28

Abstract

Abstract

Actively practicing ESG concepts is an important way for manufacturing enterprises to achieve green and sustainable development. Based on the data of Chinese A-share listed manufacturing enterprises in Shanghai and Shenzhen from 2009 to 2022, this paper examines the impact and mechanism of ESG performance on the financing efficiency of manufacturing enterprises. The results indicate that positive ESG performance significantly improves the financing efficiency of manufacturing firms through three mechanisms: meeting effective market demands, gaining investors' favor, and increasing firms' innovation outputs; the effects are more obvious for small-sized enterprises, enterprises with high media attention, and enterprises in high-polluting industries; the government strengthens the supervision over environmental policies, significantly enhancing corporate ESG performance's effects on the improvement of financing efficiency. The study reveals that ESG practices actively fulfilled by enterprises promote the development of green and low-carbon industries, realizing the national dual carbon goals. It provides policy insights for realizing the symbiotic and integrated development of enterprises and the social environment.
- ESG,
- market demand,
- investors favor,
- innovation output,
- financing efficiency

FullText(HTML)

References(56)

References

[1]	王翌秋, 谢萌, 郭冲. 企业ESG表现影响银行信贷决策吗——基于中国A股上市公司的经验证据[J]. 金融经济学研究, 2023(5): 97-114.
[2]	毛其淋, 王玥清. ESG的就业效应研究: 来自中国上市公司的证据[J]. 经济研究, 2023(7): 86-103.
[3]	武鹏, 杨科, 蒋峻松, 等. 企业ESG表现会影响盈余价值相关性吗?[J]. 财经研究, 2023(6): 137-152, 169.
[4]	戴翔, 杨双至. 数字赋能、数字投入来源与制造业绿色化转型[J]. 中国工业经济, 2022(9): 83-101.
[5]	吴翌琳, 黄实磊. 融资效率对企业双元创新投资的影响研究——兼论产品市场竞争的作用[J]. 会计研究, 2021(12): 121-135. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-2886.2021.12.009
[6]	潘艺, 张金昌. 数字金融、融资水平与企业全要素生产率——基于A股和新三板制造业上市企业的实证研究[J]. 华东经济管理, 2023(11): 59-69.
[7]	谭智佳, 张启路, 朱武祥, 等. 从金融向实体: 流动性风险的微观传染机制与防范手段——基于中小企业融资担保行业的多案例研究[J]. 管理世界, 2022(3): 35-59. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-5502.2022.03.004
[8]	王义中, 林溪, 李振华, 等. 数字普惠金融助力共同富裕: 基于流动性约束视角[J]. 经济研究, 2024(6): 49-68.
[9]	刘建秋, 徐雨露. ESG表现与企业韧性[J]. 审计与经济研究, 2024(1): 54-64.
[10]	范云朋, 孟雅婧, 胡滨. 企业ESG表现与债务融资成本——理论机制和经验证据[J]. 经济管理, 2023(8): 123-144.
[11]	陈国进, 丁赛杰, 赵向琴, 等. 中国绿色金融政策、融资成本与企业绿色转型——基于央行担保品政策视角[J]. 金融研究, 2021(12): 75-95.
[12]	李增福, 冯柳华. 企业ESG表现与商业信用获取[J]. 财经研究, 2022(12): 151-165.
[13]	PITCHFORD R. How liable should a lender be? the case of judgment-proof firms and environmental risk: reply[J]. The American Economic Review, 2001, 91(3): 739-745. doi: 10.1257/aer.91.3.739
[14]	盛明泉, 李志杰, 汪顺. ESG信息披露与企业全要素生产率[J]. 统计与信息论坛, 2024(8): 88-100.
[15]	刘阳, 张桂涛. 基于企业环保目标和消费者环保意识的闭环供应链网络决策研究[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2019(11): 71-81.
[16]	FRIEDE G, BUSCH T, BASSEN A. ESG and financial performance: aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies[J]. Journal of Sustainable Finance Investment, 2015, 5(4): 210-233. doi: 10.1080/20430795.2015.1118917
[17]	史永东, 王淏淼. 企业社会责任与公司价值——基于ESG风险溢价的视角[J]. 经济研究, 2023(6): 67-83.
[18]	邱牧远, 殷红. 生态文明建设背景下企业ESG表现与融资成本[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2019(3): 108-123.
[19]	胡洁, 于宪荣, 韩一鸣. ESG评级能否促进企业绿色转型?——基于多时点双重差分法的验证[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2023(7): 90-111.
[20]	REBER B, GOLD A, GOLD S. ESG disclosure and idiosyncratic risk in initial public offerings[J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2022, 179(3): 867-886. doi: 10.1007/s10551-021-04847-8
[21]	周中胜, 原智超. 企业ESG表现会影响股票流动性吗?[J]. 财贸研究, 2023(12): 64-77.
[22]	盛明泉, 余璐, 王文兵. ESG披露与股价崩盘风险[J]. 贵州财经大学学报, 2023(2): 32-41.
[23]	CAPELLE-BLANCARD G, PETIT A. Every little helps? ESG news and stock market reaction[J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2019, 157(2): 543-565. doi: 10.1007/s10551-017-3667-3
[24]	李瑾. 我国A股市场ESG风险溢价与额外收益研究[J]. 证券市场导报, 2021(6): 24-33.
[25]	BÉNABOU R, TIROLE J. Individual and corporate social responsibility[J]. Economica, 2010, 77(305): 1-19. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0335.2009.00843.x
[26]	苏冬蔚, 刘子茗. 绿色金融改革是否影响企业绿色绩效与漂绿风险?[J]. 国际金融研究, 2023(4): 74-85.
[27]	王秀贞, 丁慧平, 胡毅. 基于DEA方法的我国中小企业融资效率评价[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2017(4): 865-874.
[28]	顾海峰, 卞雨晨. 科技-金融耦合协同提升了企业融资效率吗?——基于中国755家科技型上市公司的证据[J]. 统计与信息论坛, 2020(9): 94-109.
[29]	郭金录, 金宁, 张婕, 等. 科技金融与企业融资效率——来自长三角城市群高新技术企业的经验证据[J]. 中央财经大学学报, 2023(10): 68-80.
[30]	赵峰, 张甜甜, 马光明. 金融衍生品监管法律与海外企业融资效率: 基于中国金融衍生品监管指数的实证分析[J]. 世界经济研究, 2021(2): 77-89.
[31]	王玉凤, 张淑芹. 绿色金融改革创新对环保企业投融资的影响——基于绿色金融改革创新试验区的经验证据[J]. 中国流通经济, 2023(5): 118-128.
[32]	陈梦根, 张乔. 数字金融对企业融资行为的影响效应及作用机制[J]. 改革, 2023(9): 34-52.
[33]	后小仙, 郑田丹. 金融化、财政激励与企业投资结构[J]. 审计与经济研究, 2021(3): 117-127.
[34]	王琳璘, 廉永辉, 董捷. ESG表现对企业价值的影响机制研究[J]. 证券市场导报, 2022(5): 23-34.
[35]	吴育辉, 田亚男, 陈韫妍, 等. 绿色债券发行的溢出效应、作用机理及绩效研究[J]. 管理世界, 2022(6): 176-193.
[36]	GONG G, HUANG X, WU S, et al. Punishment by securities regulators, corporate social responsibility and the cost of debt[J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2021, 171(2): 337-356. doi: 10.1007/s10551-020-04438-z
[37]	ARNO R, PUAL S. Why do investors hold socially responsible mutual funds?[J]. The Journal of Finance, 2017, 72(6): 2505-2550. doi: 10.1111/jofi.12547
[38]	马歇尔. 经济学原理: 上卷[M]. 朱志泰, 译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 1964.
[39]	MCWILLIAMS A, SIEGEL D. Research notes and communications: corporate social responsibility and financial performance: correlation or misspecification?[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2000, 21(5): 603-609. doi: 10.1002/%28SICI%291097-0266%28200005%2921%3A5%3C603%3A%3AAID-SMJ101%3E3.0.CO%3B2-3
[40]	孙瑾, 陈晨, 陆娟. 资源稀缺对消费者绿色产品偏好的影响研究[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2023(2): 82-99.
[41]	张伟, 王笑, 何冬霞. 正面网络口碑对消费者绿色消费意向的影响机制研究[J]. 管理评论, 2023(2): 193-204.
[42]	GHOUL E, GUEDHAMI O, KWOK C, et al. Does corporate social responsibility affect the cost of capital?[J]. Journal of Banking and Finance, 2011, 35(9): 2388-2406. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378426611000781
[43]	JIE C, SHERIDAN T, XINTONG Z, et al. ESG preference, institutional trading, and stock return patterns[J]. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 2022, 58(5): 1843-1877. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-financial-and-quantitative-analysis/article/esg-preference-institutional-trading-and-stock-return-patterns/6FE00808FC61893DF3F9D983136BD8B3
[44]	李增福, 陈嘉滢. 企业ESG表现与短债长用[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2023(12): 152-171.
[45]	宋岩, 刘悦婷, 张鲁光. 异质机构投资者持股与企业声誉——基于企业社会责任的中介效应检验[J]. 中国管理科学, 2023(7): 103-114.
[46]	PORTER M, CLAAS V. Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship[J]. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1995, 9(4): 97-118. https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/jep.9.4.97
[47]	方先明, 胡丁. 企业ESG表现与创新——来自A股上市公司的证据[J]. 经济研究, 2023(2): 91-106.
[48]	ZUO Y, JIANG S WEI J. Can corporate social responsibility mitigate the liability of newness? evidence from China[J]. Small Business Economics, 2022, 59(2): 537-592. doi: 10.1007/s11187-021-00551-z
[49]	陈思, 何文龙, 张然. 风险投资与企业创新: 影响和潜在机制[J]. 管理世界, 2017(1): 158-169.
[50]	岳翔宇, 王国红, 黄昊. ESG责任履行与企业技术创新提质增效[J]. 工业技术经济, 2024(3): 54-64.
[51]	江艇. 因果推断经验研究中的中介效应与调节效应[J]. 中国工业经济, 2022(5): 100-120.
[52]	牛志伟, 许晨曦, 武瑛. 营商环境优化、人力资本效应与企业劳动生产率[J]. 管理世界, 2023(2): 83-100.
[53]	曾国安, 苏诗琴, 彭爽. 企业杠杆行为与技术创新[J]. 中国工业经济, 2023(8): 155-173.
[54]	谢红军, 吕雪. 负责任的国际投资: ESG与中国OFDI[J]. 经济研究, 2022(3): 83-99.
[55]	王锋, 葛星. 低碳转型冲击就业吗——来自低碳城市试点的经验证据[J]. 中国工业经济, 2022(5): 81-99.
[56]	杨有德, 徐光华, 沈弋. "由外及内": 企业ESG表现风险抵御效应的动态演进逻辑[J]. 会计研究, 2023(2): 12-26.