Does Internet Third-party Payment Platform Become Monopoly: Based on the Measurement of Market Power
-
摘要: 企业市场势力是甄别垄断的重要指标，平台经济反垄断需要充分考虑厂商的市场势力。选取第三方支付作为研究对象，采用修正后的勒纳指数测算第三方支付平台厂商的市场势力，结果表明：支付宝、财付通等9家平台厂商均利用市场势力来提升其垄断能力，以期获得垄断地位，且主要是利用显性市场势力来提升其垄断能力。但市场份额与市场势力之间存在着背离，市场份额最高的两家厂商为支付宝和财付通，其市场势力却处于底端水平。因此，加强第三方支付等互联网平台经济的反垄断，需要同时考量平台厂商的市场份额与市场势力，将其作为反垄断的重要评判标准。Abstract: The market power of a company is an important indicator to identify monopoly. Anti-monopoly in platform economyis needed to fully consider the market power of platforms. This study selects third-party payment as the research object, and uses the revised Lerner Index to measure the market power of third-party payment market platforms. The results show that 9 platforms including Alipay and Tenpay all use the market power to enhance monopoly capability and obtain the monopoly position, which the dominant market power is mainly used to enhance the monopoly ability.However, there is a divergence between market share and market power. The two platforms with the highest market share are Alipay and Tenpay. The market power of these two platforms is at the bottom. Accordingly, market share and market power of platforms should be used as an important criterion for anti-monopoly of the internet platform economy such as third-party payment.
-
Key words:
- third-party payment /
- platform economy /
- platform manufacturer /
- market power /
- market share /
- Lerner Index /
- monopoly position /
- anti-monopoly /
- internet platform
-
表 1 第三方支付平台厂商市场势力测度结果
公司名称 显性市场势力 隐性市场势力 显性市场势力+ 隐性市场势力 市场份额(%) 支付宝(中国)网络技术有限公司 0.993 642 6 -0.001 321 0.992 321 6 54.2 财付通支付科技有限公司 1.002 717 0 -0.000 185 1.002 532 0 39.5 苏宁消费金融有限公司 1.025 880 6 0.005 933 1.031 813 6 0.2 京东数字科技控股股份有限公司 1.025 522 4 0.003 303 1.028 825 4 0.8 中国银联股份有限公司 1.025 701 5 -0.001 746 1.023 955 5 0.5 快钱支付清算信息有限公司 1.025 641 8 -0.000 045 1.025 596 8 0.6 联动优势电子商务有限公司 1.025 582 1 -0.001 327 1.024 255 1 0.7 拉卡拉支付股份有限公司 1.025 373 2 -0.000 294 1.025 079 2 1.0 通联支付网络服务股份有限公司 1.024 507 5 -0.000 147 1.024 360 5 2.5 注：市场份额数据来源于艾瑞咨询。 
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] 曲创, 刘重阳. 平台厂商市场势力测度研究——以搜索引擎市场为例[J]. 中国工业经济, 2016(2): 98-100. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GGYY201602008.htm [2] 秦伟广. 我国大型工业企业市场势力测度研究——基于改进的勒纳指数法[J]. 产经评论, 2017(2): 136-140. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TQYG201702012.htm [3] 周文, 韩文龙. 平台经济发展再审视: 垄断与数字税新挑战[J]. 中国社会科学, 2021(3): 103-118. https://xuewen.cnki.net/CCND-HXSB202105170160.html [4] 刘蕾. 平台经济模式及监管难点与创新监管对策[J]. 技术经济与管理研究, 2021(4): 28-31. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-292X.2021.04.006 [5] 王先林. 论反垄断法对平台经济健康发展的保障[J]. 江淮论坛, 2021(2): 1-9. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FZSL202118019.htm [6] EVANS, SCHMALENSEE. The antitrust analysis of multi-sided platform markets[J]. Yale Journal on Regulation, 2012, 20: 327-379. http://heinonlinebackup.com/hol-cgi-bin/get_pdf.cgi?handle=hein.journals/yjor20§ion=13 [7] 张超. 数字货币交易平台的风险及其监管规则建构[J]. 财经论丛, 2020(3): 105-113. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-4892.2020.03.011 [8] 黄志军, 曹东坡, 刘丹鹭. 互联网经济、制度与创新价值链——基于人力资本与制度发展指数的测度分析[J]. 经济理论与经济管理, 2015(9): 26-27. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-596X.2015.09.003 [9] ARMSTRONG M. Competition in two-sided markets[J]. RAND Journal of Economics, 2006, 37(3): 668-691. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-2171.2006.tb00037.x [10] 谢莉娟, 张昊. 国内市场运行效率的互联网驱动——计量模型与案例调研的双重验证[J]. 经济理论与经济管理, 2015(9): 41-42. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-596X.2015.09.004 [11] 曲创, 王夕琛. 互联网平台垄断行为的特征、成因与监管策略[J]. 改革, 2021(5): 1-11. [12] 徐文. 论共享平台的发展偏差与分类矫治[J]. 广东财经大学学报, 2020(1): 67-79. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SONG202001010.htm [13] COWLING K, WATERSON P. Price-cost margins and market structure[J]. Economica, 1976, 43(171): 267-274. doi: 10.2307/2553125 [14] CLARKE R, DAVIES S. Market structure and price-cost margins[J]. Economica, 1982, 49(195): 277-287. doi: 10.2307/2553628 [15] BAKER J B, BRESNAHAN T F. Estimating the residual demand curve facing a single firm[J]. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 1988, 6(3): 283-300. doi: 10.1016/S0167-7187(88)80012-2 [16] HALL R E. The relation between price and marginal cost in U.S. industry[J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1988, 96(5): 921-947. doi: 10.1086/261570 [17] BERGER A, HANNAN T. The price-concentration relationship in banking[J]. Review of Economics and Statistics, 1989, 2: 291-299. http://ideas.repec.org/r/tpr/restat/v71y1989i2p291-99.html [18] KLETTE T J. Market power, scale economies and productivity: estimates from a panel of establishment data[J]. Journal of Industrial Economics, 1999, 47(4): 451-476. doi: 10.1111/1467-6451.00108/abstract [19] DE LOECKER J. Recovering markups from production data[J]. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 2011, 29 (3): 350-355. doi: 10.1016/j.ijindorg.2011.02.002 [20] DUFWENBERG M, GNEEZY U. Price competition and market concentration: an experimental study[J]. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 1998, 18(1): 7-22. [21] GRÖNLUND M, BJÖRKROTH T. Newspaper market concentration, competitive pressure and financial performance: the case of finland[J]. Journal of Media Business Studies, 2011, 8(3): 19-50. doi: 10.1080/16522354.2011.11073525 [22] 黄先海, 陈晓华. 浙江企业国际市场势力的测度与分析——以纺织服装业为例[J]. 浙江社会科学, 2007(6): 42-44. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZJSH200706008.htm [23] 于良春, 付强. 中国电网市场势力的分析与测度[J]. 中国工业经济, 2012(11): 45-47. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GGYY201211005.htm [24] 徐齐利. 互联网平台电商企业的垄断势力与结构——对百度搜索平台客户集中度的测算[J]. 当代财经, 2017(3): 99-103. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DDCJ201703009.htm [25] 李国栋, 惠亨玉, 肖俊极. 中国银行业市场竞争程度及其顺周期性——以勒纳指数为衡量指标的重新考察[J]. 财经研究, 2009(3): 16-26. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-9952.2009.03.002 [26] MARTIN STEPHEN. 高级产业经济学(中译本)[M]. 上海: 上海财经大学出版社, 2003: 138-140. -
点击查看大图
图(1) / 表(1)
计量
- 文章访问数: 441
- HTML全文浏览量: 324
- PDF下载量: 21
- 被引次数: 0