平台数据型自我优待的反垄断法分析

李鑫

平台数据型自我优待的反垄断法分析

李鑫

中国政法大学民商经济法学院，北京 100088

基金项目:

北京市社会科学基金青年项目 20FXC019

详细信息

作者简介:
李鑫(1996-)，女，黑龙江齐齐哈尔人，中国政法大学民商经济法学院博士研究生

中图分类号: D972.294;F724.6
计量
- 文章访问数: 404
- HTML全文浏览量: 174
- PDF下载量: 54
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2022-07-28
- 网络出版日期: 2023-03-09
- 刊出日期: 2023-01-28

Analysis of Platform Data-based Self-reference by Antitrust Law

LI Xin

School of Civil and Commercial Economic Law, China University of Political Science and Law, Beijing 100088, China

摘要

摘要: 平台数据型自我优待是自我优待的一种新形式，代表着平台企业在未经允许的情况下，使用平台内第三方卖家非公开数据分析结果以增强自营业务竞争实力的行为，实践中存在调整报价、复制并推出新商品、调整库存等多种表现。平台对第三方卖家非公开数据的使用会产生损害竞争的效果，从而可能违反反垄断法。在没有统一违法性标准和判决先例的前提下，平台数据型自我优待的违法性判断应注重分析数据种类、数据属性、数据使用目的，以及是否存在弥补竞争损害替代性渠道。为修复平台数据型自我优待造成的竞争损害，反垄断执法机构应设置较为具体的救济措施。行为性救济方面可以要求平台设立数据隔离机制，确立数据最小化原则，建立数据使用的同意规则，且考虑平台对第三方卖家开放部分数据；当行为性救济实施效果不佳或平台已多次实施数据型自我优待行为时，结构性救济如剥离平台自营业务线也存在适用空间。
- 平台 /
- 平台经济 /
- 数据 /
- 自我优待 /
- 竞争损害 /
- 反垄断 /
- 救济措施
Abstract: Platform data-based self-preference is a new form of self-preference, which represents the behavior of platform enterprises to use the result of non-public data analysis of third-party sellers without permission toenhance the competitiveness of their own business. In practice, there are various manifestations, such as adjusting prices, copying and launching new products, and adjusting inventory. The use of non-public data of third-party sellers on the platform will have the effect of harming competition, which may violate the antitrust law. In the absence of uniform illegality standard and judgment precedent, the judgement of illegality of platform data-based self-preference should depend on the analysis of the data types, data attributes, purposes of data use, and the alternative channelsto compensate for competition damage.In order to remedy the competitive damage caused by the platformdata-based self-preference, the antitrust law enforcement agency should set up more specific remedies. In terms of behavioral remedies, the platform can be required to set up a data isolation mechanism, establish the principle of data minimization, set up consent rules for data use, and open some data to third-party sellers. When behavioral remedies are not effective or the platform has implemented data-based self-preference for many times, structural remedies such as divestiture the platformself-operated business line are applicable.
- platform /
- platform economy /
- data /
- self-preference /
- competition damage /
- antitrust /
- remedy

HTML全文

参考文献(21)

[1]	EUROPEAN COMMISSION. Antitrust: commission sends statement of objections to Amazon for the use of non-public independent seller data and opens second investigation into its e-commerce business practices[EB/OL]. (2020-11-10)[2022-06-11]. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_20_2077.
[2]	丁茂中. 自我优待的反垄断规制问题[J]. 法学论坛, 2022(4): 87-97. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SDFX202204008.htm
[3]	COLOMO P I. Self-preferencing: yet another epithet in need of limiting principles[J]. World Competition, 2020, 43: 1-37. doi: 10.54648/WOCO2020001
[4]	谢国辉. 竞争法下的平台技术与数据自我优待行为研究[J]. 电子知识产权, 2022(8): 73-81.
[5]	孟雁北, 赵泽宇. 反垄断法下超级平台自我优待行为的合理规制[J]. 中南大学学报: 社会科学版, 2022(1): 70-82. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZLXS202201007.htm
[6]	DEUTSCHER E. Google shopping and the quest for a legal test for self-preferencing under article 102 TFEU[J]. European Papers, 2021, 6(3): 1345-1361.
[7]	JAKAB M. Effective regulation, legal certainty and the conundrum of online platform self preferencing[C]. Prague: Charles University in Prague Faculty of Law Research Paper No. 2020/1/2.
[8]	BOUGETTE P, BUDZINSKI O, MARTY F M. Self-preferencing and competitive damages: a focus on exploitative abuses[J]. The Antitrust Bulletin, 2022, 67(2): 1-24.
[9]	MATTIOLI D. Amazon scooped up data from its own sellers to launch competing products[EB/OL]. (2020-04-23)[2022-05-25]. https://www.foxbusiness.com/retail/amazon-scooped-up-data-from-its-own-sellers-to-launch-competing-products.
[10]	赫伯特·霍温坎普. 联邦反托拉斯政策[M]. 许光耀, 江山, 王晨, 译. 北京: 法律出版社, 2009.
[11]	KRATTENMAKER T G, SALOP S C. Anticompetitive exclusion: raising rivals' costs to achieve power over price[J]. The Yale Law Journal, 1986, 96(2): 255.
[12]	杨文明. 网络平台独家交易的违法性分析[J]. 现代法学, 2021(4): 156-167. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XDFX202104013.htm
[13]	保罗·尼豪尔, 彼得·范·克莱恩布吕格尔. 创新在竞争法分析中的角色[M]. 韩伟, 等, 译. 北京: 法律出版社, 2020.
[14]	EUROPEAN COMMISSION. Antitrust: commission sends statement of objections to Google on Android operating system and applications[EB/OL]. (2016-04-20)[2022-05-26]. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/IP_16_1492.
[15]	焦海涛. 个人信息的反垄断法保护: 从附属保护到独立保护[J]. 法学, 2021(4): 108-124. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FXZZ202104009.htm
[16]	莫里斯·E·斯克图, 艾伦·P·格鲁内斯. 大数据与竞争政策[M]. 兰磊, 译. 北京: 法律出版社, 2019.
[17]	RUBINFELD D L, GAL M. Access barriers to big data[J]. Arizona Law Review, 2016, 59(2): 2.
[18]	LIPSMAN A. Top 10 US ecommerce companies 2020[EB/OL]. (2020-05-10)[2022-06-01]. https://www.emarketer.com/content/top-10-us-ecommerce-companies-2020.
[19]	KOCH L. Looking for a new product? you probably searched Amazon[EB/OL]. (2019-05-31)[2022-06-01]. https://www.emarketer.com/content/looking-for-a-new-product-you-probably-searched-amazon.
[20]	赵宏. 《民法典》时代个人信息权的国家保护义务[J]. 经贸法律评论, 2021(1): 5-24. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JMFV202101001.htm
[21]	JOHNSON R. Amazon just made the ＄30k Amazon retail analytics premium data free[EB/OL]. (2020-02-26)[2022-06-03]. https://www.searchenginejournal.com/amazon-retail-analytics-premium-data-free/350692.