The Impact Mechanism and Effectiveness of the Servant Leadership on Work-Family Facilitation
-
摘要: 基于资源保存理论视角, 研究服务型领导对员工工作—家庭促进的影响机制, 同时加入个体层面的心理安全和权利距离导向两个因素作为中介变量和调节变量, 旨在探寻这四者间是否存在相互影响。结果表明: 服务型领导通过员工个体层面的心理安全对其工作—家庭促进产生显著的正向影响, 但权利距离导向会调节这一影响效果。具体表现为: 对于权力距离导向水平较高的员工, 服务型领导对其心理安全的正向促进作用减弱, 从而减弱了服务型领导对其工作—家庭促进的正向影响。反之, 对于权力距离导向较低的员工, 服务型领导对其心理安全的正向促进作用会提升, 从而提升了服务型领导对其工作—家庭促进的正向影响。Abstract: Based on conservation resources theory, this study analyzed the impact of service leadership on work-family facilitation, and employed psychological safety and power distance orientation as the mediator to test the hypothesis. The research results demonstrate that servant leadership has significant positive impact on work-family facilitation through individual psychological security, but power distance orientation can adjust the effect. The specific performance is: for employees with higher level of power distance orientation, the positive effect of service-oriented leadership on their psychological security will be weakened, which weakens the service-oriented leadership on the positive effect of employees' work-family facilitation. On the contrary, for the employees with lower power distance orientation, the positive effect of service-oriented leadership on their psychological safety will be enhanced, thus enhancing the positive impact of service-oriented leadership on employees' work-family facilitation.
-
表 1 测量模型之间的比较结果
模型 包含因子 χ2 df RMSEA CFI SRMR 基准模型 4因子：SL；PD；PS；WFF 100.93 48 0.07 0.97 0.04 模型1 3因子：SL+PD；PS；WFF 452.83 51 0.19 0.80 0.23 模型2 2因子：SL+PD；PS+WFF 523.81 53 0.20 0.76 0.23 模型3 2因子：SL+PS；PD+WFF 370.76 53 0.17 0.84 0.19 模型4 1因子：SL+PS+PD+WFF 988.10 54 0.21 0.53 0.29 注：SL代表服务型领导，PD代表权力距离导向，PS代表心理安全，WFF代表工作—家庭促进，“+”代表因子合并。 
下载: 导出CSV
表 2 各变量的均值、标准差、信度分析及相关分析结果
变量 平均数 标准差 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 性别 1.55 0.49 — 年龄 29.30 1.52 0.01 — 工龄 4.98 6.41 -0.15* 0.25** — 教育程度 2.89 0.70 0.09 -0.08 -0.34** — 服务型领导 3.46 0.52 -0.01 -0.01 -0.04 0.10 (0.93) 权力距离导向 2.78 0.72 -0.19** 0.16** 0.24** -0.06 0.04 (0.80) 心理安全 3.58 0.48 -0.07 -0.01 -0.01 0.07 0.66** -0.06 (0.85) 工作—家庭促进 3.82 0.55 -0.11 -0.02 0.04 -0.01 0.47** -0.07 0.61** (0.73) 注：N=255; **P < 0.01, *P < 0.05；括号内数值是量表的内部一致性信度。
下载: 导出CSV
表 3 中介效应检验结果(N=255)
变量 系数 标准误 t p 直接效应和总效应(Direct and total effects) 服务型领导到工作—家庭促进 0.49 0.05 8.51 0.00 服务型领导到心理安全 0.62 0.04 14.29 0.00 心理安全到工作—家庭促进(控制服务型领导) 0.61 0.07 8.13 0.00 服务型领导到工作—家庭促进(控制心理安全) 0.11 0.07 1.67 0.09
下载: 导出CSV
表 4 权力距离导向的调节效应(N=255)
变量 心理安全 系数 标准误 t p 常数 3.58 0.02 159.15 0.00 服务型领导 0.61 0.04 13.96 0.00 权力距离导向 -0.04 0.03 -1.29 0.19 服务型领导×权力距离导向 -0.12 0.05 -2.28 0.02
下载: 导出CSV
表 5 调节效应下自变量对因变量的条件效应
变量 工作—家庭促进 Boot indirect effect Boot SE BootLL90%CI BootUL90%CI 权力距离
导向取值均值-标准差(-0.72) 0.43 0.08 0.29 0.57 均值(0.00) 0.37 0.06 0.26 0.49 均值+标准差(0.72) 0.31 0.07 0.20 0.43 注：N=255，报告结果为非标准化回归系数，Bootstrap sample size=5000。SE=standard error(标准误差)，LL=lower limit(下限)，UL=upper limit(上限)，CI=confident interval(置信区间)。下表同。
下载: 导出CSV
表 6 有调节的中介指数(Index of Moderated Mediation)
变量 指数 Boot SE BootLL90%CI BootUL90%CI 权力距离导向 -0.07 0.04 -0.16 -0.01
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] 唐汉瑛, 马红宇, 王斌. 工作-家庭界面研究的新视角: 工作家庭促进研究[J]. 心理科学进展, 2007(5): 852-858. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XLXD200705022.htm [2] JAWAHAR I M, KISAMORE J L, STON T H, et al. Differential effect of inter-role conflict on proactive individual's experience of burnout[J]. Journal of Business and Psychology, 2012, 27(2): 243-254. doi: 10.1007/s10869-011-9234-5 [3] SHOKLY K M, SINGLA N. Reconsidering work-family interactions and satisfaction: a meta-analysis[J]. Journal of Management, 2011, 37(3): 861-886. doi: 10.1177/0149206310394864 [4] 周春燕, 叶天, 黄海, 等. 家庭-工作冲突对工作母亲婚姻满意度的影响[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2018(5): 1002-1005. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZLCY201805035.htm [5] 姜海, 吴婧怡, 王谦. 企业员工家庭-工作冲突对离职意向的影响: 有调节的中介模型[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2019(5): 1054-1057. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZLCY201905042.htm [6] CROUTER A C. Spillover from family to work: the neglected side of the work-family interface[J]. Human Relations, 1984, 37: 425-442. doi: 10.1177/001872678403700601 [7] GREEHAUS J H, POWELL G N. When work and family are allies: a theory of work-family enrichment[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2006, 31: 72-92. doi: 10.5465/amr.2006.19379625 [8] WAYNE J H, MUSISCA N, FLEESON W. Considering the role of personality in the work-family experience: relationships of the big five to work-family conflict and facilitation[J]. Journal of Vocational Behaviour, 2004, 64: 108-130. doi: 10.1016/S0001-8791(03)00035-6 [9] VOYDANOFF P. The differential salience of family and community demands and resources for family-to-work conflict and facilitation[J]. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 2005, 26: 395-417. doi: 10.1007/s10834-005-5904-7 [10] WU T, CHANG P C. The impact of work-family programs on work-family facilitation and role performance: the dual moderating effect of gender[J]. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources. 2020, 58: 46-65. [11] GRZYACZ J G, BULTER A B. The impact of job characteristics on work-to-family facilitation: testing a theory and distinguishing a construct[J]. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 2005, 10: 97-109. doi: 10.1037/1076-8998.10.2.97 [12] WAYNE J H, GRZYWACZ J G, CARLSON D S, et al. Work-family facilitation: a theoretical explanation and model of primary antecedents and consequences[J]. Human Resource Management Review, 2007, 17: 63-76. doi: 10.1016/j.hrmr.2007.01.002 [13] EVA N, ROBIN M, SENDJAYA S, et al. Servant leadership: a systematic review and call for future research[J]. The Leadership Quarterly, 2019, 30(1): 111-132. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.07.004 [14] LIDEN R C, WAYNE S J, LIAO C, et al. Servant Leadership and serving culture: influence on individual and antiperformance[J]. A-cademy of Management Journal, 2014, 57(5): 1434-1452. http://psycnet.apa.org/record/2014-44719-010 [15] TANG G, KWAN H K, ZHANG D, et al. Work-family effects of servant leadership: the roles of emotional exhaustion and personal learning[J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2016, 137: 285-297. doi: 10.1007/s10551-015-2559-7 [16] 翟皎娇, 曹霞, 崔勋. 基于资源保存理论的组织的组织整治知觉对国有企业的员工工作绩效的影响机理研究[J]. 管理学报, 2014(6): 852-860. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-884x.2014.06.010 [17] 颜爱民, 肖遗规, 唐明. 服务型领导与下属工作绩效的跨层分析——以心理安全为中介[J]. 中南大学学报: 社会科学版, 2017(1): 74-81. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-3104.2017.01.011 [18] NEWMAN A, DONOHUE R, EVA N. Psychological safety: a systematic review of the literature[J]. Human Resource Management Review, 2017, 27(3): 521-535. doi: 10.1016/j.hrmr.2017.01.001 [19] YAN A, XIAO Y. Servant Leadership and employee voice behavior: a cross-level investigation in China[J]. Springer Plus, 2016, 5: 1595. doi: 10.1186/s40064-016-3264-4 [20] CHUGHTAI A A. Servant leadership and follower outcomes: mediating effects of organizational identification and psychological safety[J]. The Journal of Psychology, 2016, 150(7): 866-880. doi: 10.1080/00223980.2016.1170657 [21] MOORE J H, WANG Z. Mentoring top leadership promotes organizational innovativeness through psychological safety and is moderated by cognitive adaptability[J]. Frontiers in psychology, 2017, 8: 1-9. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28303114 [22] SCHAUBROECK J, LAM S S K, PENG A C. Cognition-based and affect-based trust as mediators of leader behavior influences on team performance[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2011, 96(4): 863-871. doi: 10.1037/a0022625 [23] MIAO Q, EVA N, NEWMAN A, et al. Entrepreneurial leadership and performance outcomes of top management teams in entrepreneurial ventures: the mediating effects of psychological safety[J]. Journal of Small Business Management, 2019, 57(3): 1119-1135. doi: 10.1111/jsbm.12465 [24] PARK G, DESHON R P. A multilevel model of minority opinion expression and team decision-making effectiveness[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2010, 95(5): 824-833. doi: 10.1037/a0019939 [25] YANIV I. Group diversity and decision quality: amplification and attenuation of the framing effect[J]. International Journal of Forecasting, 2011, 27(1): 41-49. doi: 10.1016/j.ijforecast.2010.05.009 [26] 胡百精, 杨奕. 欲望与认同: 二十世纪早期的群体传播思想——基于特洛特群体心理和行为研究的重述与讨论[J]. 国际新闻界, 2017(10): 55-76. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GJXW201710004.htm [27] LIDEN R C, WAYNE S J, JAWORSKI R A, et al. Social loafing: a field investigation[J]. Journal of Management, 2004, 30(2): 285-304. doi: 10.1016/j.jm.2003.02.002 [28] ZOU W, TIAN Q, LIU J. Servant leadership, social exchange relationships, and follower's helping behavior: positive reciprocity belief matters[J]. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 2015, 51: 147-156. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhm.2015.08.012 [29] CLGUSTON M, HOWELL J P, DORFMAN P W. Does cultural socialization predict multiple bases and foci of commitment?[J]. Journal of Management, 2000, 26(1): 5-30. doi: 10.1177/014920630002600106 [30] HOUSE R J, JAVIDAN M, HANGES P J, et al. Understanding cultures and implicit leadership theories across the globe: an introduction to project GLOBE[J]. Journal of World Business, 2002, 37(1): 3-10. doi: 10.1016/S1090-9516(01)00069-4 [31] LIDEN R C, WAYNE S J, ZHAO H, et al. Servant Leadership: Development of a multidimensional measure and multi-level assessment[J]. The Leadership Quarterly, 2008, 19(2): 161-177. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2008.01.006 [32] TNMMERS L G, BRONKHORST B A C. The impact of leader-member exchange(LMX)on work-family interference and work-family facilitation[J]. Personnel Review, 2014, 43(4): 573-591. doi: 10.1108/PR-05-2013-0080 [33] STEVAN E HOBFOLL, JONATHON HALBESLEBEN, JEAN-PIERRE NEVEU, et al. Conservation of resources in the organizational context: the reality of resources and their consequences[J]. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2018, 5: 103-128. doi: 10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032117-104640 [34] EMILY M HUNTER, SARA J P, DAWN S, et al. Linking team resources to work-family enrichment and satisfaction[J]. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 2010, 77(2): 304-312. doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2010.05.009 [35] ZHANG X A, LI N, HARRIS T B. Putting non-work ties to work: the case of guanxi in supervisor-subordinate relationships[J]. Leadership Quarterly, 2015, 26(1): 37-54. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2014.04.008 [36] KIM T Y, LIU Z Q, DIEFENDORFF J M. Leader-member exchange and job performance: the effects of taking charge and organizational tenure[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2015, 36(2): 216-231. doi: 10.1002/job.1971 [37] SIEMESEN E, ROTHB A V, BALASUBRAMANIANM S. How motivationopportunity and ability grive knowledge sharing: the constraining factor model[J]. Journal of Operations Management, 2008, 26(3): 426-445. doi: 10.1016/j.jom.2007.09.001 [38] 张鹏程, 刘文兴, 廖建桥. 魅力型领导对员工创造力的影响机制: 仅有心理安全足够吗[J]. 管理世界, 2011(10): 94-107. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GLSJ201110010.htm [39] WALUMBWA F O, SCHAUBROECK J. Leader personality traits and employee voice behavior: mediating roles of ethical leadership and work group psychological Safety[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2009, 94(5): 1275-1286. doi: 10.1037/a0015848 [40] HALBESLEBEN J R B, NEVEU J P, PAUSTIAN-UNDERDAHL S C, et al. Getting to the"COR": understanding the role of resources in conservation of resources theory[J]. Journal of Management, 2014, 40(5): 1334-1364. doi: 10.1177/0149206314527130 [41] STEVAN E HOBFOLL, JONATHON HALBESLEBEN, JEAN-PIERRE NEVEU, et al. Conservation of resources in the organizational context: the reality of resources and their consequences[J]. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2018, 5: 103-128. doi: 10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032117-104640 [42] NEMBHARD I M, EDMONDSON A C. Psychological safety: a foundation for speaking up, collaboration, and experimentation in organizations[M]∥K S CAMERON, G M SPREITZER. The Oxford handbook of positive organizational scholarship. New York: Oxford University Press, 2011. [43] MEINDL J R. The romance of leadership as a Follower-centric Theory: a social constructionist approach[J]. The Leadership Quarterly, 1995, 6(3): 329-341. doi: 10.1016/1048-9843(95)90012-8 [44] KIRKAMAN B L, CHEN G, FARH J L, et al. Individual power distance orientation and follower reactions to transformational leaders: a cross-level, cross-cultural examination[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2009, 52(4): 744-764. doi: 10.5465/amj.2009.43669971 [45] LOI R, LAM L W, CHAN K W. Coping with job insecurity: the role of procedural justice, ethical leadership and power distance orientation[J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2012, 108(3): 361-372. doi: 10.1007/s10551-011-1095-3 [46] EARLEY P C, EREZ M. The transplanted executive: why you need to understand how workers in other countries see the world differently[M]. New York: Oxford University Press, 1997. [47] EDMONDSON A. Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1999, 44(2): 350-383. doi: 10.2307/2666999 [48] PODSAKOFF P M, MACKENZIE S B, LEE J-Y, et al. Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2003, 88(5): 879-903. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 [49] LITTLE T D, CUNNINGHAM W A, SHAHAR G, et al. To parcel or not to parcel: exploring the question, weighing the merits[J]. Structural equation modeling, 2002, 9(2): 151-173. doi: 10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_1 [50] HAYESAF, Introduction to mediation, moderationand conditional process analysis: a regression-based approach[M]. New York: The Guilford Press, 2012. [51] COLE M S, WALTER F, BRUCH H. Affective mechanisms linking dysfunctional behavior to performance in work teams: a moderated mediation study[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2008, 93(5): 945-958. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.93.5.945 [52] AIKEN L S, WEST S G. Multiple regression: testing and interpreting interaction[M]. Newbury Park: Sage, 1991. [53] HOBFOLL S E. Social and psychological resources and adaptation[J]. Review of General Psychology, 2002, 6(4): 307-324. doi: 10.1037/1089-2680.6.4.307 [54] BROWN M E, TREVIÑO L K. Leader-follower values congruence: are socialized charismatic leaders better able to achieve it[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2009, 94(2): 478-490. doi: 10.1037/a0014069 [55] CHONG E, WOLF H. Factors influencing followers'perception of organizationalleaders[J]. Leadership & amp; Organization Development Journal, 2010, 31(5): 402-419. doi: 10.1108/01437731011056434 -
点击查看大图
图(2) / 表(6)
计量
- 文章访问数: 225
- HTML全文浏览量: 194
- PDF下载量: 10
- 被引次数: 0